linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eryu Guan <guan@eryu.me>
To: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>,
	Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] fstests: fix _scratch_mkfs_sized failure handling
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 01:03:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YhJ0Uql0Z5eK0IQh@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220218073156.2179803-1-shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>

On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 04:31:50PM +0900, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> When generic/204 is run for btrfs-zoned filesystem on zoned block devices with
> GB size order, it takes very long time to complete. The test case creates 115MiB
> filesystem on the scratch device and fills files in it within decent run time.
> However, with btrfs-zoned condition, the test case creates filesystem as large
> as the device size and it takes very long time to fill it all. Three causes were
> identified for the long run time, and this series addresses them.
> 
> The first cause is mixed mode option that _scratch_mkfs_sized helper function
> adds to mkfs.btrfs. This option was added for both regular btrfs and
> zoned-btrfs. However, zoned-btrfs does not support mixed mode. The mkfs with
> mixed mode fails and results in _scratch_mkfs_sized failure. The mixed mode
> shall not be specified for btrfs-zoned filesystem.
> 
> The second cause is unnecessary call of the _scratch_mkfs helper function in the
> test case generic/204. This helper function is called to obtain data block size
> and i-node size. However, these numbers can be obtained from _scratch_mkfs_sized
> call. The _scratch_mkfs function call shall be removed.
> 
> The third cause is no check of return code from _scratch_mkfs_sized. The test
> case generic/204 calls both _scratch_mkfs and _scratch_mkfs_sized, and does not
> check return code from them. If _scratch_mkfs succeeds and _scratch_mkfs_sized
> fails, the scratch device still has valid filesystem created by _scratch_mkfs.
> Following test workload can be executed without failure, but the filesystem
> does not have the size specified for _scratch_mkfs_sized. The return code of
> _scratch_mkfs_sized shall be checked to catch the mkfs failure. This problem
> exists not only in generic/204, but also in other test cases which call both
> _scratch_mkfs and _scratch_mkfs_sized.
> 
> In this series, the first patch addresses the first cause, and the second patch
> addresses the second cause. These two patches fix the test case generic/204.
> Following three patches address the third cause, and fix other test cases than
> generic/204.
> 
> The last patch is an additional clean up of the helper function _filter_mkfs.
> During this fix work, it was misunderstood that this function were xfs unique.
> To clarify it can be extended to other filesystems, factor out xfs unique part.
> 
> Changes from v2:
> * Added Reviewed-by tags
> 
> Changes from v1:
> * Added 2nd patch which removes _scratch_mkfs call from generic/204
> * Added 6th patch which factors out xfs unique part from _filter_mkfs
> * Dropped 3 patches which had renamed _filter_mkfs to _xfs_filter_mkfs
> * Dropped generic/204 hunk from the 3rd patch
> 
> Shin'ichiro Kawasaki (6):
>   common/rc: fix btrfs mixed mode usage in _scratch_mkfs_sized
>   generic/204: remove unnecessary _scratch_mkfs call
>   generic/{171,172,173,174}: check _scratch_mkfs_sized return code
>   ext4/021: check _scratch_mkfs_sized return code
>   xfs/015: check _scratch_mkfs_sized return code
>   common: factor out xfs unique part from _filter_mkfs

Thanks a lot for all the changes! I've applied all patches except the
first one. Also many thanks to Darrick for reviewing them!

Thanks,
Eryu

> 
>  common/filter     | 40 +---------------------------------------
>  common/rc         |  8 ++++----
>  common/xfs        | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/ext4/021    |  2 +-
>  tests/generic/171 |  2 +-
>  tests/generic/172 |  2 +-
>  tests/generic/173 |  2 +-
>  tests/generic/174 |  2 +-
>  tests/generic/204 |  6 +-----
>  tests/xfs/015     |  2 +-
>  10 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-20 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-18  7:31 [PATCH v3 0/6] fstests: fix _scratch_mkfs_sized failure handling Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2022-02-18  7:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] common/rc: fix btrfs mixed mode usage in _scratch_mkfs_sized Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2022-02-20 17:00   ` Eryu Guan
2022-02-21  7:02     ` Naohiro Aota
2022-02-21 11:02       ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-02-18  7:31 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] generic/204: remove unnecessary _scratch_mkfs call Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2022-02-18  7:31 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] generic/{171,172,173,174}: check _scratch_mkfs_sized return code Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2022-02-18  7:31 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] ext4/021: " Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2022-02-18  7:31 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] xfs/015: " Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2022-02-18  7:31 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] common: factor out xfs unique part from _filter_mkfs Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2022-02-20 17:03 ` Eryu Guan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YhJ0Uql0Z5eK0IQh@desktop \
    --to=guan@eryu.me \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
    --cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).