public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] test_dummy_encryption fixes and cleanups
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 16:36:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnmlZ15YPS1cy4aV@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220501050857.538984-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>

On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 10:08:50PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> This series cleans up and fixes the way that ext4 and f2fs handle the
> test_dummy_encryption mount option:
> 
> - Patches 1-2 make test_dummy_encryption consistently require that the
>   'encrypt' feature flag already be enabled and that
>   CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION be enabled.  Note, this will cause xfstest
>   ext4/053 to start failing; my xfstests patch "ext4/053: update the
>   test_dummy_encryption tests" will fix that.
> 
> - Patches 3-7 replace the fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption() helper
>   function with new functions that work properly with the new mount API,
>   by splitting up the parsing, checking, and applying steps.  These fix
>   bugs that were introduced when ext4 started using the new mount API.
> 
> We can either take all these patches through the fscrypt tree, or we can
> take them in multiple cycles as follows:
> 
>     1. patch 1 via ext4, patch 2 via f2fs, patch 3-4 via fscrypt
>     2. patch 5 via ext4, patch 6 via f2fs
>     3. patch 7 via fscrypt
> 
> Ted and Jaegeuk, let me know what you prefer.
> 
> Changed v1 => v2:
>     - Added patches 2-7
>     - Also reject test_dummy_encryption when !CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION
> 
> Eric Biggers (7):
>   ext4: only allow test_dummy_encryption when supported
>   f2fs: reject test_dummy_encryption when !CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION
>   fscrypt: factor out fscrypt_policy_to_key_spec()
>   fscrypt: add new helper functions for test_dummy_encryption
>   ext4: fix up test_dummy_encryption handling for new mount API
>   f2fs: use the updated test_dummy_encryption helper functions
>   fscrypt: remove fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption()

Since I haven't heard from anyone, I've gone ahead and applied patches 3-4 to
fscrypt#master for 5.19, so that the filesystem-specific patches can be taken in
5.20.  But patches 1-2 could still be applied now.

Any feedback on this series would be greatly appreciated!

- Eric

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-09 23:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-01  5:08 [PATCH v2 0/7] test_dummy_encryption fixes and cleanups Eric Biggers
2022-05-01  5:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] ext4: only allow test_dummy_encryption when supported Eric Biggers
2022-05-11 12:50   ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-05-11 17:18     ` Eric Biggers
2022-05-01  5:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] f2fs: reject test_dummy_encryption when !CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION Eric Biggers
2022-05-01  5:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] fscrypt: factor out fscrypt_policy_to_key_spec() Eric Biggers
2022-05-01  5:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] fscrypt: add new helper functions for test_dummy_encryption Eric Biggers
2022-05-01  5:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] ext4: fix up test_dummy_encryption handling for new mount API Eric Biggers
2022-05-09 23:40   ` Eric Biggers
2022-05-11 17:54     ` [f2fs-dev] " Ritesh Harjani
2022-05-11 18:03       ` Eric Biggers
2022-05-13 10:58         ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-05-13 22:24           ` Eric Biggers
2022-05-13 11:07   ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-05-13 21:59     ` Eric Biggers
2022-05-01  5:08 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] f2fs: use the updated test_dummy_encryption helper functions Eric Biggers
2022-05-01  5:08 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] fscrypt: remove fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption() Eric Biggers
2022-05-09 23:36 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2022-05-10 23:23   ` [PATCH v2 0/7] test_dummy_encryption fixes and cleanups Jaegeuk Kim
2022-05-13 19:36 ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-05-13 23:26   ` Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YnmlZ15YPS1cy4aV@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox