linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Sun Ke <sunke32@huawei.com>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ext4: resize fs after resize_inode without e2fsck
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 07:51:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YtqPXcFbbrFBr1om@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b424fd69-aeb4-f749-d09b-5d824454dd94@huawei.com>

On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 04:16:26PM +0800, Sun Ke wrote:
> 
> 1. The test run fsck automatically, and complain inconsistent,I think it
> need not run fsck.

The check script always run fscks after the test.  In order to
suppress the fsck complaint, we'll need to add this after the
resize2fs invocation:

_scratch_unmount
$DEBUGFS_PROG -w -R "set_super_value s_reserved_gdt_blocks 0" $SCRATCH_DEV \
        >>$seqres.full 2>&1

This resets the s_reserved_gdt_blocks field back to zero, so the fsck
doesn't fail.  Which is fine, because the point of the test is to see
whether the kernel dereferences a NULL pointer or not.

> 2. It warn missing kernel fix, but the commit had merged.

The way _fixed_by_kernel_commit works is if the test fails (for any
reason), it prints that you MAY be missing the bugfix commit:

> HINT: You _MAY_ be missing kernel fix:
>       b55c3cd102a6 ext4: add reserved GDT blocks check

		     	       		- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-22 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-13  9:28 [PATCH v3 0/2] two regression tests for ext4 Sun Ke
2022-07-13  9:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ext4: resize fs after resize_inode without e2fsck Sun Ke
2022-07-14 15:46   ` Zorro Lang
2022-07-14 22:00     ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-07-15 18:08       ` Zorro Lang
2022-07-21  3:24         ` Sun Ke
2022-07-22  8:16         ` Sun Ke
2022-07-22 11:51           ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2022-07-22 15:11             ` Zorro Lang
2022-07-22 16:36               ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-07-13  9:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ext4: set 256 blocks in a block group then apply io pressure Sun Ke
2022-07-14 16:02   ` Zorro Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YtqPXcFbbrFBr1om@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sunke32@huawei.com \
    --cc=zlang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).