From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, hpa <hpa@zytor.com>,
dyoung <dyoung@redhat.com>, kexec <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
eperezma <eperezma@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@redhat.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
John Ogness <jogness@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Lockdep warnings on kexec (virtio_blk, hrtimers)
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:48:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z1wfF6NJRZh1jROz@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y10j95v7.ffs@tglx>
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 12:31:24PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13 2024 at 19:09, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 11:42:59AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> That's the control thread on CPU0. The hotplug thread on CPU1 is stuck
> >> here:
> >>
> >> task:cpuhp/1 state:D stack:0 pid:24 tgid:24 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000
> >> Call Trace:
> >> <TASK>
> >> __schedule+0x51f/0x1a80
> >> schedule+0x3a/0x140
> >> schedule_timeout+0x90/0x110
> >> msleep+0x2b/0x40
> >> blk_mq_hctx_notify_offline+0x160/0x3a0
> >> cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x2a8/0x6c0
> >> cpuhp_thread_fun+0x1ed/0x270
> >> smpboot_thread_fn+0xda/0x1d0
> >>
> >> So something with those blk_mq fixes went sideways.
> >
> > The cpuhp callback is just waiting for inflight IOs to be completed when
> > the irq is still live.
> >
> > It looks same with the following report:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/F991D40F7D096653+20241203211857.0291ab1b@john-PC/
> >
> > Still triggered in case of kexec & qemu, which should be one qemu
> > problem.
>
> I'd rather say, that's a kexec problem. On the same instance a loop test
> of suspend to ram with pm_test=core just works fine. That's equivalent
> to the kexec scenario. It goes down to syscore_suspend() and skips the
> actual suspend low level magic. It then resumes with syscore_resume()
> and brings the machine back up.
>
> That runs for 2 hours now, while the kexec muck dies within 2
> minutes....
>
> And if you look at the difference of these implementations, you might
> notice that kexec just implemented some rudimentary version of the
> actual suspend logic. Based on let's hope it works that way.
>
> This is just insane and should be rewritten to actually reuse the suspend
> mechanism, which is way better tested than this kexec jump muck.
But kexec is supposed to align with reboot/shutdown, instead of suspend,
and it is calling ->shutdown() for notifying driver & device.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-13 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-09 14:28 Lockdep warnings on kexec (virtio_blk, hrtimers) David Woodhouse
2024-12-10 1:56 ` Jason Wang
2024-12-11 12:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2024-12-12 11:07 ` David Woodhouse
2024-12-12 13:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-12-12 13:46 ` David Woodhouse
2024-12-12 18:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-12-12 19:19 ` David Woodhouse
2024-12-13 0:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-12-13 9:31 ` David Woodhouse
2024-12-13 9:43 ` David Woodhouse
2024-12-13 10:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-12-13 11:09 ` Ming Lei
2024-12-13 11:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-12-13 11:48 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2024-12-13 13:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-12-13 14:07 ` David Woodhouse
2024-12-13 17:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-12-13 17:17 ` David Woodhouse
2024-12-13 17:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-12-13 17:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-12-13 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-12-13 20:16 ` David Woodhouse
2024-12-14 9:57 ` David Woodhouse
2024-12-16 12:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-12-13 17:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-12-13 13:17 ` David Woodhouse
2024-12-13 11:12 ` David Woodhouse
2024-12-13 11:33 ` Ming Lei
2024-12-13 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-13 13:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-12-16 13:20 ` [PATCH] sched: Prevent rescheduling when interrupts are disabled Thomas Gleixner
2024-12-16 17:41 ` David Woodhouse
2024-12-12 11:12 ` Lockdep warnings on kexec (virtio_blk, hrtimers) Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z1wfF6NJRZh1jROz@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).