From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8648C77B6C
	for <linux-ext4@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue,  4 Apr 2023 15:30:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S235575AbjDDPau (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-ext4@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 4 Apr 2023 11:30:50 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48002 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S229691AbjDDPat (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 4 Apr 2023 11:30:49 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A4B8449E;
        Tue,  4 Apr 2023 08:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version
        :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:
        Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description;
        bh=oRUY6/nVUdkJWa+BgfeeaayCjIWt7sUTbaMHlXagjNw=; b=Fn5hZQrai6OxRnc53wDWJvsQUi
        l0f2jY/0e+u5hzy8V4qA0uX6eNIA0HL+/ThjvZ+58OfHp5yJqwS4UwWtJa85+FoQv1YOF18PQ8y/e
        fZlpCpeR10Vlao2xf/ZiIbKLawae3/lvFHmhVGCbU5EseY8BqD2Zq9XQmLqu1Rs3Ie8J+zOpNJhqg
        WOPGvV+nuedhEDvyiMY4PKQZIb21ECVPvSGrC0nkv5nmqQuhLqlykdFWXGNzzFth3lMtIfRXD4Co3
        i32ooWz4rlCAa8EN+liRSIfzaYutkEpt2RTf3KItD2VFGXXaziebwy1oggfRtL771dhH2RwYQSCtU
        E2Ik6G2g==;
Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
        id 1pjicG-0020iL-1q;
        Tue, 04 Apr 2023 15:30:36 +0000
Date:   Tue, 4 Apr 2023 08:30:36 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@redhat.com>
Cc:     djwong@kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com, ebiggers@kernel.org,
        hch@infradead.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
        fsverity@lists.linux.dev, rpeterso@redhat.com, agruenba@redhat.com,
        xiang@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org,
        damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, jth@kernel.org,
        linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
        cluster-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/23] fsverity: make fsverity_verify_folio() accept
 folio's offset and size
Message-ID: <ZCxCnC2lM9N9qtCc@infradead.org>
References: <20230404145319.2057051-1-aalbersh@redhat.com>
 <20230404145319.2057051-6-aalbersh@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230404145319.2057051-6-aalbersh@redhat.com>
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hch@infradead.org> by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 04:53:01PM +0200, Andrey Albershteyn wrote:
> Not the whole folio always need to be verified by fs-verity (e.g.
> with 1k blocks). Use passed folio's offset and size.

Why can't those callers just call fsverity_verify_blocks directly?