From: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Ferry Toth <ftoth@exalondelft.nl>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ext2, quota, and udf fixes for 6.6-rc1
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 23:36:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTLk1G0KCF7YNjRx@surfacebook.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgHFSTuANT3jXsw1EtzdHQe-XQtWQACzeFxn2BEBzX-gA@mail.gmail.com>
Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 12:43:56PM -0700, Linus Torvalds kirjoitti:
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 11:29, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'll reply to this with the attached object file, I assume it won't go to the
> > mailing list, but should be available in your mailbox.
>
> Honestly, both cases (that function gets inlined twice) look
> *identical* from a quick look, apart from obviously the extra call to
> __quota_error().
>
> I might be missing something, but this most definitely is not a "gcc
> ends up creating very different code when it doesn't need to
> synchronize around the call" thing.
>
> So a compiler issue looks very unlikely. No absolute guarantees - I
> didn't do *that* kind of walk-through instruction by instruction - but
> the results actually seem to line up perfectly.
>
> Even register allocation didn't change, making the compare between #if
> 0 and without rather easy.
>
> There's one extra spill/reload due to the call in the "non-#if0" case,
> and that actually made me look twice (because it spilled %eax, and
> then reloaded it as %rcx), but it turns that %eax/%ecx had the same
> value at the time of the spill, so even that was not a "real"
> difference.
>
> So I will claim that no, it's not the compiler. It's some unrelated
> subtle timing, or possibly just a random code layout issue (because
> the code addresses do obviously change).
Okay, but since now I can't use the certain configuration, the bug is
persistent to me after this merge with the GCC. Yet, you mentioned that
you would expect some reports but I don't think many people have a
configuration similar to what I have. In any case a bug is lurking somewhere
there.
Let me check next week on different CPU (but I'm quite sceptical that it
may anyhow trigger the same behaviour as if it's a timing, many parameters
are involved, including hardware clocks, etc).
That said, if you or anyone has ideas how to debug futher, I'm all ears!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-20 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-30 10:24 [GIT PULL] ext2, quota, and udf fixes for 6.6-rc1 Jan Kara
2023-08-30 19:50 ` pr-tracker-bot
2023-10-17 10:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-17 10:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-17 10:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-17 11:36 ` Jan Kara
2023-10-17 11:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-17 11:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-17 13:32 ` Jan Kara
2023-10-17 13:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-17 14:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-17 15:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-17 15:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-17 16:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-18 18:46 ` Jan Kara
2023-10-19 8:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-19 10:18 ` Jan Kara
2023-10-19 12:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-19 14:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-19 14:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-19 14:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-19 16:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-10-19 17:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-19 17:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-10-19 17:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-10-19 18:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-19 18:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-19 18:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-10-20 14:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-20 15:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-20 15:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-20 17:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-10-20 18:09 ` Jan Kara
2023-10-21 1:48 ` Baokun Li
2023-10-23 12:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-23 13:40 ` Baokun Li
2023-10-20 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-10-20 18:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-20 18:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-20 19:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-10-20 20:36 ` andy.shevchenko [this message]
2023-10-21 23:36 ` Kees Cook
2023-10-23 11:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-23 12:15 ` Jan Kara
2023-10-23 16:08 ` Kees Cook
2023-10-20 18:05 ` Jan Kara
2023-10-20 20:29 ` andy.shevchenko
2023-10-20 11:07 ` Jan Kara
2025-01-28 13:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-22 13:46 ` Linux regression tracking #adding (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-11-22 8:15 ` Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-11-24 16:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-01-28 13:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZTLk1G0KCF7YNjRx@surfacebook.localdomain \
--to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=ftoth@exalondelft.nl \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox