Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Shi <coshi036@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
	Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>,
	Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>,
	Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
	Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>,
	Yuezhang Mo <yuezhang.mo@sony.com>,
	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
	Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	gfs2@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chao Shi <coshi036@gmail.com>, Weidong Zhu <weizhu@fiu.edu>
Subject: [PATCH v2 16/21] gfs2: check for a metadata write error with buffer_write_io_error()
Date: Thu,  6 Aug 2026 12:58:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a09b6d08d31d24f69b833e4d855ed88875e87780.1785951556.git.coshi036@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1785951556.git.coshi036@gmail.com>

gfs2_ail1_start_one() and gfs2_ail1_empty_one() decide whether a buffer on
the ail reached the disk by looking at BH_Uptodate once it is no longer
busy.  That relies on the write completion handler clearing BH_Uptodate on
error, which this series removes: a buffer whose write failed still holds
the data the filesystem asked to be written, so declaring it not up to date
is wrong and makes callers re-read it.  Test BH_Write_EIO instead.  In
gfs2_ail1_start_one() the test is the positive one, so the sense has to be
inverted rather than the flag simply swapped.

This is not a pure conversion for gfs2, because gfs2 already has a private
write completion handler that behaves the way this series is heading:
gfs2_end_log_write_bh() calls mark_buffer_write_io_error() and leaves
BH_Uptodate alone.  Buffers completed through it are therefore invisible to
both tests today, and start being caught once they look at BH_Write_EIO.
That is a real behaviour change, and it is the one gfs2 wanted: a failed
log write now withdraws the filesystem instead of passing silently.

gfs2_pin() is a different case and gets a different treatment.  Its
!buffer_uptodate() test is not only a proxy for a failed write - a buffer
with no valid contents at all is equally a reason to withdraw before
pinning it into a transaction - so the write error test is added to it
rather than replacing it.

Left alone deliberately: the BUG_ON(!buffer_uptodate(bh)) in gfs2_unpin()
and the two WARN_ON()s in fs/gfs2/rgrp.c.  After this series they simply
stop firing for write errors, which is correct; turning them into
BUG_ON(buffer_write_io_error(bh)) would newly panic on an I/O error.

Acked-by: Weidong Zhu <weizhu@fiu.edu>
Signed-off-by: Chao Shi <coshi036@gmail.com>
---
 fs/gfs2/log.c  | 4 ++--
 fs/gfs2/lops.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/gfs2/log.c b/fs/gfs2/log.c
index 78bba8cc10b8..e3e0dcb1f567 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/log.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/log.c
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ __acquires(&sdp->sd_ail_lock)
 		gfs2_assert(sdp, bd->bd_tr == tr);
 
 		if (!buffer_busy(bh)) {
-			if (buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
+			if (!buffer_write_io_error(bh)) {
 				list_move(&bd->bd_ail_st_list,
 					  &tr->tr_ail2_list);
 				continue;
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ static int gfs2_ail1_empty_one(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_trans *tr,
 			active_count++;
 			continue;
 		}
-		if (!buffer_uptodate(bh) &&
+		if (buffer_write_io_error(bh) &&
 		    !cmpxchg(&sdp->sd_log_error, 0, -EIO))
 			gfs2_io_error_bh(sdp, bh);
 		/*
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/lops.c b/fs/gfs2/lops.c
index 6dabe73ad790..3df6e4b7e8b9 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/lops.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/lops.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ void gfs2_pin(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct buffer_head *bh)
 	clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
 	if (test_set_buffer_pinned(bh))
 		gfs2_assert_withdraw(sdp, 0);
-	if (!buffer_uptodate(bh))
+	if (!buffer_uptodate(bh) || buffer_write_io_error(bh))
 		gfs2_io_error_bh(sdp, bh);
 	bd = bh->b_private;
 	/* If this buffer is in the AIL and it has already been written
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-06 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-06 16:58 [PATCH v2 00/21] buffer: stop clearing BH_Uptodate when a write fails Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/21] buffer_head: Remove b_page Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/21] buffer: allow a buffer_head to point at memory outside the page cache Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/21] jbd2: point the shadow buffer at the frozen data directly Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/21] buffer: read the folio's mapping directly in buffer_set_crypto_ctx() Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/21] buffer: clear BH_Write_EIO when a buffer is forgotten Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/21] buffer: discard BH_Write_EIO along with the rest of the buffer state Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/21] buffer: detect metadata write errors with buffer_write_io_error() Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/21] adfs: check for a directory write error " Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 09/21] ext2: check for an xattr block " Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/21] omfs: check for an inode " Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 11/21] exfat: check for a directory " Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 12/21] fat: check for a metadata " Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 13/21] ext4: " Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 14/21] ocfs2: " Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 15/21] ocfs2: check for a stale write error before reusing a metadata buffer Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` Chao Shi [this message]
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 17/21] jbd2: report journal write errors with BH_Write_EIO Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 18/21] jbd2: say what jbd2_freeze_jh_data()'s assertion is actually checking Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 19/21] ext4, jbd2: report fast commit write errors with BH_Write_EIO Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 20/21] buffer: stop touching BH_Uptodate on write completion Chao Shi
2026-08-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 21/21] buffer: clear BH_Write_EIO when a write succeeds, not when one starts Chao Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a09b6d08d31d24f69b833e4d855ed88875e87780.1785951556.git.coshi036@gmail.com \
    --to=coshi036@gmail.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=gfs2@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark@fasheh.com \
    --cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=weizhu@fiu.edu \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yuezhang.mo@sony.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox