From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next ext4 inode size 128 corrupted
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 14:27:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a77881074b9710399fd2ad43e17fa26bf9b397cb.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a51815d0-16fb-201b-77db-e16af4caa8b0@google.com>
On Tue, 2023-07-18 at 11:03 -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2023, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 20:43 -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > Hi Jeff,
> > >
> > > I've been unable to run my kernel builds on ext4 on loop0 on tmpfs
> > > swapping load on linux-next recently, on one machine: various kinds
> > > of havoc, most common symptoms being ext4_find_dest_de:2107 errors,
> > > systemd-journald errors, segfaults. But no problem observed running
> > > on a more recent installation.
> > >
> > > Bisected yesterday to 979492850abd ("ext4: convert to ctime accessor
> > > functions").
> > >
> > > I've mostly averted my eyes from the EXT4_INODE macro changes there,
> > > but I think that's where the problem lies. Reading the comment in
> > > fs/ext4/ext4.h above EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE() led me to try "tune2fs -l"
> > > and look at /etc/mke2fs.conf. It's an old installation, its own
> > > inodes are 256, but that old mke2fs.conf does default to 128 for small
> > > FSes, and what I use for the load test is small. Passing -I 256 to the
> > > mkfs makes the problems go away.
> > >
> > > (What's most alarming about the corruption is that it appears to extend
> > > beyond just the throwaway test filesystem: segfaults on bash and libc.so
> > > from the root filesystem. But no permanent damage done there.)
> > >
> > > One oddity I noticed in scrutinizing that commit, didn't help with
> > > the issues above, but there's a hunk in ext4_rename() which changes
> > > - old.dir->i_ctime = old.dir->i_mtime = current_time(old.dir);
> > > + old.dir->i_mtime = inode_set_ctime_current(old.inode);
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I suspect the problem here is the i_crtime, which lives wholly in the
> > extended part of the inode. The old macros would just not store anything
> > if the i_crtime didn't fit, but the new ones would still store the
> > tv_sec field in that case, which could be a memory corruptor. This patch
> > should fix it, and I'm testing it now.
>
> That makes sense.
>
> >
> > Hugh, if you're able to give this a spin on your setup, then that would
> > be most helpful. This is also in the "ctime" branch in my kernel.org
> > tree if that helps. If this looks good, I'll ask Christian to fold this
> > into the ext4 conversion patch.
>
> Yes, it's now running fine on the problem machine, and on the no-problem.
>
> Tested-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
>
> >
> > Thanks for the bug report!
>
> And thanks for the quick turnaround!
>
> But I'm puzzled by your dismissing that
> - old.dir->i_ctime = old.dir->i_mtime = current_time(old.dir);
> + old.dir->i_mtime = inode_set_ctime_current(old.inode);
> in ext4_rename() as "actually looks fine".
>
> Different issue, nothing to do with the corruption, sure. Much less
> important, sure. But updating ctime on the wrong inode is "fine"?
Ahh , sorry I wasn't looking at that properly. I think you're correct.
The right fix is probably to move ext4 to use generic_rename_timestamp.
I'll test and send another patch for that.
Thanks again!
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-18 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-18 3:43 linux-next ext4 inode size 128 corrupted Hugh Dickins
2023-07-18 10:32 ` Jeff Layton
2023-07-18 12:54 ` Jeff Layton
2023-07-18 18:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-07-18 18:27 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a77881074b9710399fd2ad43e17fa26bf9b397cb.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).