From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, djwong@kernel.org, zlang@kernel.org,
david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] xfs: Fail remount with noattr2 on a v5 xfs with CONFIG_XFS_SUPPORT_V4=y
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 06:05:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAuIn7zbSNRzQ3WH@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <757190c8-f7e4-404b-88cd-772e0b62dea5@gmail.com>
Hi Nirjhar,
sorry for the delay, I dropped the ball while on vacation.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 01:05:46PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>
> Yes, we need a second pass and I think that is already being done by
> xfs_finish_flags() in xfs_fs_fill_super(). However, in xfs_fs_reconfigure(),
> we still need a check to make a transition from /* attr2 -> noattr2 */ and
> /* noattr2 -> attr2 */ (only if it is permitted to) and update
> mp->m_features accordingly, just like it is being done for inode32 <->
> inode64, right?
Yes.
> Also, in your previous reply[1], you did suggest moving the
> crc+noattr2 check to xfs_fs_validate_params() - Are you suggesting to add
> another optional (NULLable) parameter "new_mp" to xfs_fs_validate_params()
> and then moving the check to xfs_fs_validate_params()?
No, let's skip that.
But we really should share the code for the validation. So while a lot
of the checks in xfs_finish_flags are uselss in remount, it might still
be a good idea to just use that for the option validation so that we
don't miss checks in remount.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-25 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-11 18:14 [PATCH v1] xfs: Fail remount with noattr2 on a v5 xfs with CONFIG_XFS_SUPPORT_V4=y Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-14 5:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-15 7:18 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-16 6:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-16 7:35 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-25 5:52 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-25 13:05 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-04-28 8:41 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aAuIn7zbSNRzQ3WH@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox