From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Documentation <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: ext4: atomic_writes: Remove cross-reference labels
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 07:07:00 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEoaJEhw5qHkd2_w@archie.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ikl21a5u.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1699 bytes --]
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 11:05:17AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 04:11:59PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> >> Sphinx reports htmldocs warnings on ext4 atomic block writes docs:
> >>
> >> Documentation/filesystems/ext4/atomic_writes.rst:5: WARNING: duplicate label atomic_writes, other instance in Documentation/filesystems/ext4/atomic_writes.rst
> >> Documentation/filesystems/ext4/atomic_writes.rst:207: WARNING: duplicate label atomic_write_bdev_support, other instance in Documentation/filesystems/ext4/atomic_writes.rst
> >>
> >> These warnings reference duplicated cross-reference labels to themselves in
> >> the same doc, which are because atomic_writes.rst is transcluded in
> >> overview.rst via include:: directive, thus the culprit docs get processed
> >> twice.
> >
> > <confused> How is that possible? atomic_writes.rst is only "include::"d
> > once in overview.rst. Is the file implicitly included through some
> > other means?
>
> Sphinx wants to snarf up every .rst file it sees, regardless of whether
> it is explicitly made part of the document tree. So it will pick up
> atomic_writes.rst separately from the include.
>
> This could be "fixed" by removing the .rst extension from the included
> file. But, since there is no use of the atomic_writes label to begin
> with, it's better to just take it out. The other fix, removing a cross
> reference, is not entirely ideal, but there is little text between the
> label and the reference.
So removing the labels looks good to you, right?
Confused...
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-12 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-10 9:11 [PATCH] Documentation: ext4: atomic_writes: Remove cross-reference labels Bagas Sanjaya
2025-06-11 16:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-11 17:05 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-06-12 0:07 ` Bagas Sanjaya [this message]
2025-06-12 1:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-12 2:48 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-06-12 3:14 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-06-12 12:22 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-06-12 12:20 ` Jonathan Corbet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aEoaJEhw5qHkd2_w@archie.me \
--to=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox