From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B85E1DA60D; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753884050; cv=none; b=gQgqTc03Pnfbf5ggU7/VIdcWlFJ/2/IaCUcd0YIjs4oHfll2dcGHmc1szN7QyfaBfZyj1qdULjJSRNcerMwimo6dOUYOfjPHn6BkLCXqYUyjsMgpNqRzhB2OwjYL5NTFZ66eZQKQadcpLIwoFZaC+nstLCz89RHRQ4bjYD3u0AY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753884050; c=relaxed/simple; bh=b1BzOVs+xTZVKuI2csl0s8gtRoQhCdrEdPDJl88e2nY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tmicWqeEkVQNPshzl/7EbJyTeeebi/Q5A6+ta8tFV6DNamixPQHiIYZoNcst8cZa4ZLRbr1Y01uwKrsYIrLXboYzWWQ1ENEG/OI4Nr3s+hZ3GzP4dbxgg/eCLvx6/PMHUOlGyLD1iYVC9wA/zGCYTZOXMknCUGGPWw/8jlVgVxo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=bm/rYsay; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="bm/rYsay" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1753884049; x=1785420049; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=b1BzOVs+xTZVKuI2csl0s8gtRoQhCdrEdPDJl88e2nY=; b=bm/rYsaymABhZYlrdScLurCYOX49AEZhsBj9vK+faRSyPiaUJ5KpvlP/ ZdJ39gYTxiEVxtppUEE6HBdO1Wp5nec7jJ85AedOv0F9TjWt8ryalYJ7g whqRd/Okv/9N5iID0vIC1awrnLeLyyfo1m1hBCE5AqvxWfMz6mdeHJSf6 BnuK84TcDbXdbfzP8MIRFBEYV4yXpitIoKGUyCUpU1zPeI9zFW1qEi6jh fq7dt6C+/GIV01nHOx7obhdrrV8a2oVBXqtZoEoO2lbJsqzIoAYF4FqjX BJbNoBWa5Mju0vgHfVGtoa91QGaM15W+19Q3/UJz8pmHiYb+Iab8y6p3M g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: EhKSNi+CQo29WJ14F+E5Mw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: e3hxxanMSu21E/usbO1Xlw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11507"; a="55883895" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,350,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="55883895" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by orvoesa112.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Jul 2025 07:00:48 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: yxreNB54S1mHmw72TEYTig== X-CSE-MsgGUID: gJ1OkRvzS5q1LKcxMRdWQQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,350,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="163445568" Received: from black.igk.intel.com ([10.91.253.5]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2025 07:00:46 -0700 Received: by black.igk.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 527D717; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 17:01:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 17:01:17 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Eric Biggers Cc: Theodore Ts'o , kernel test robot , Ext4 Developers List , oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, ethan@ethancedwards.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ext4: refactor the inline directory conversion and new directory codepaths Message-ID: References: <20250712181249.434530-3-tytso@mit.edu> <202507130429.rPIzofCD-lkp@intel.com> <20250721231559.GA85006@quark> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250721231559.GA85006@quark> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 04:15:59PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 05:12:55AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > fs/ext4/namei.c: In function 'ext4_init_new_dir': > > >> fs/ext4/namei.c:2968:34: warning: variable 'de' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] > > 2968 | struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de; > > | ^~ > > This warning is present in ext4/dev now. For somebody (who doesn't alter CONFIG_WERROR) this is a build breakage with both GCC and clang. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko