From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
zlang@redhat.com, fstests@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] generic/774: reduce file size
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 01:29:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRMCFb73LbsCagid@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fce01b4e-928a-48c8-afe2-265e5893c6cf@oracle.com>
On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 09:13:27AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 10/11/2025 18:27, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> >
> > We've gotten complaints about this test taking hours to run and
> > producing stall warning on test VMs with a large number of cpu cores. I
> > think this is due to the maximum atomic write unit being very large on
> > XFS where we can fall back to a software-based out of place write
> > implementation.
> >
> > On the victim machine, the atomic write max is 4MB and there are 24
> > CPUs. As a result, aw_bsize to be 1MB, so the file size is
> > 1MB * 24 * 2 * 100 == 4.8GB. I set up a test machine with fast storage
> > and 24 CPUs, and the atomic writes poked along at 25MB/s and the total
> > runtime was 300s. On spinning rust those stats will be much worse.
> >
> > Let's try backing the file size off by 10x and see if that eases the
> > complaints.
> >
>
> The awu max for xfs is still unbounded (so the file size could still be
> huge). For ext4, it is limited by HW constraints - the largest HW awu max I
> heard about is 256KB. How about also limiting awu max to something sane,
> like 1MB?
Sounds fine to ne, as long as we document it as an arbitrary limit.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-11 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-10 18:26 [PATCHSET] fstests: more random fixes for v2025.11.04 Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-10 18:26 ` [PATCH 1/7] common: leave any breadcrumbs when _link_out_file_named can't find the output file Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-11 9:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-10 18:26 ` [PATCH 2/7] generic/778: fix severe performance problems Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-11 9:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-13 11:53 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-11-15 2:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-29 8:52 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-12-01 23:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-03 6:19 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-12-04 17:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-10 18:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] generic/778: fix background loop control with sentinel files Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-11 9:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-13 11:06 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-11-10 18:27 ` [PATCH 4/7] generic/019: skip test when there is no journal Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-11 9:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-12 18:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-10 18:27 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs/837: fix test to work with pre-metadir quota mount options Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-11 9:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-10 18:27 ` [PATCH 6/7] generic/774: reduce file size Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-11 9:13 ` John Garry
2025-11-11 9:29 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-11-11 9:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-12 18:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-13 10:44 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-11-10 18:27 ` [PATCH 7/7] generic/774: turn off lfsr Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-11 9:01 ` John Garry
2025-11-12 18:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-11 9:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-13 10:34 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRMCFb73LbsCagid@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox