From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
zlang@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs/018: remove inline xattr recovery tests
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 21:59:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYWDTrxRhDAE2efB@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260205165624.GA7703@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 08:56:24AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> "In Linux 7.0 we've changed the extended attribute update code to try to
> take a shortcut for performance reasons. Before walking through the
> attr intent state machine (slow), the update will check to see if the
> attr structure is in short format and will stay in that format after the
> change. If so, then the incore inode can be updated and logged, and the
> update is complete (fast) in a single transaction.
>
> "(Obviously, for complex attr structures or large changes we still walk
> through the intent machinery.)
>
> "However, xfs/018 tests the behavior of the "larp" error injector, which
> only triggers from inside the attr intent state machine. Therefore, the
> short format tests don't actually trip the injector. It makes no sense
> to add a new larp injection callsite for the shortcut because either the
> single transaction gets written to disk or it doesn't."
Make sense, but from looking at the test I'm still a bit confused
why it fails (vs just not testing something too useful)
>
> > Only vaguely related, but should we ensure to always clear error
> > tags after the test runs to ensure they don't leak into other tests?
>
> They go away with _scratch_remount because error tags only live as long
> as the mount.
True. While still leaves me puzzled why generic/753 now hits attr log
recovery for me sometimes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-06 5:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-02 19:11 [PATCHSET] fstests: more random fixes for v2026.01.27 Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-02 19:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs/018: remove inline xattr recovery tests Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-03 5:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-05 16:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-05 17:19 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-02-06 5:59 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-02-06 6:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-06 6:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-06 6:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-06 21:54 ` [PATCH v1.1 " Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-02 19:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs/620: force xattr leaf format for this test Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-03 5:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-05 17:15 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-02-02 19:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] generic/749: don't write a ton of _mread output to seqres.full Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-03 5:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-05 17:17 ` Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aYWDTrxRhDAE2efB@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox