From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 464E23988E1; Wed, 4 Mar 2026 13:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772631755; cv=none; b=C/IwzPBJ09+5jl6eIYgxQlEK9ISC7+tSgXt7C3nVfgxIIo/0uUMzONjdXcdCgRnm4Tyjc6cXNkryhJ2icY5LBknDwI/ZEKLFTWAAMHm0H0fq0maY/PJ1uTVUDOfQgNIfzrRlFcnEuHWniRWUhmpRyV7Mv3zXPQKiwhmzzBYcP1E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772631755; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DKbslS42HEzdZOw7zPbvYkD46CkZrv82i3vagssvN6M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sde9KBrZVBCvMcz2OKUFw1v7TRhdsgF7rSv/BDi1mU2eAKv9u4BDHSuf2GjMq4mcxktRBvDoRPUMWTKXp4KzNxvkkzQK60jOCskiHqg0F4hXnDQ2EUbCQaD6KJ/fcAl7eOGE38NGX2T+JdWUsSOwhQs7jXqtoNiQwYKXUyIv0CU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=AIuiOEt4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="AIuiOEt4" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=DKbslS42HEzdZOw7zPbvYkD46CkZrv82i3vagssvN6M=; b=AIuiOEt45JuHm/tFitR7YG4fTc 9U4D54oGLMfswhEFp4xzd+HP6pIT+5bvqVMLBs2Z/JmkEjnEcWhxAGAmG6jgOTCvXFYwX3621GvjN LDgkLlPgvsEivdn67XU7/spbOJJkiOg4W0emwCxLnmpk1ZiGnf2zebopnSKISxCh05Dlx8S6/Vy+3 p1Jjj2W31iRs9p9nl3iSk3HarZQx7i/lYryFavjj7JffWgLXQu2rZ2TxpwlcMBB7jaj79Sj1vZQaX kIKwRX2f6eH3HXj8Ux36TSWsUv64sDYYE0tSy/JeJWivTNZMVX6+V1Jd/PVVWGm8RVb5+SPvsxhOZ fsaoK0nw==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vxmUj-0000000HGga-2UOC; Wed, 04 Mar 2026 13:42:33 +0000 Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 05:42:33 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jan Kara Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christian Brauner , Al Viro , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Ted Tso , "Tigran A. Aivazian" , David Sterba , OGAWA Hirofumi , Muchun Song , Oscar Salvador , David Hildenbrand , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, Benjamin LaHaise Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/32] kvm: Use private inode list instead of i_private_list Message-ID: References: <20260303101717.27224-1-jack@suse.cz> <20260303103406.4355-63-jack@suse.cz> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260303103406.4355-63-jack@suse.cz> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 11:34:20AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > Instead of using mapping->i_private_list use a list in private part of > the inode. Similarly here, I'd be this toward the front with all the other switching from i_private_list to private members.