From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F0DF366DC1; Wed, 4 Mar 2026 13:29:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772630960; cv=none; b=VhdZH7MPQeV8GHE5gNQj22GJJgBlXPLJv7tuqnbjr3FAhZYwzisyaS/IlviS542xhgDU0+5kT4zOEZ/TjtTVmydHU2eCIH43btadkme80MVL8xXrlyUJUyb8hyuH6V0O7T4fh17iCH+c+pBSr/lbqHS8dNWT/sSkvags1Ge34vM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772630960; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IaqFF/isbWyXQxyyhesVMPgi3xKmZ9eiNwwQIv/o3A8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=TPJHc0IPFYy6IfwsOUxdvFXZBd731agKTLF9VeyEPqDPkvaz4+mLIx2CQfZ3u9x7ee9CUps2CFu9WdrHZVS2uEgWzy9wB3DHzi3StGd17QwCIJDd0lLwzqjyvX0NVijE757t5gWPooNvtI+b7VVsp8N64jmoWMU+D72fJUCWMf4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=n5QQoG7N; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="n5QQoG7N" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=FPYKHuv7AZ8xAducUFk6uwSA1xo0j120mBJpQUPt22c=; b=n5QQoG7NOMOH6TEptJh/ogSnaC 3AJmft4GcyF4eyoO13GGaPp+l/ZRDQ4b7Ptiscp2Vaj6Ck0j9oEIW3/JSHXOnhzbSuALODACCxojE SsKBb9DpB6I32LEDU1bvZLlShpPWhMuCy8SII00FJjfj+juKVt1A41YvVWRgEqNESR14Y4vhemMol GZgSYGXGksYtXcG+66fJpGUbZRCTz0Z4EyEc5gp0CqGvhccqlLF8QHBhyT3Wq/xrTW0nYaPbaHrKB sK4gs24MZ//2nDpGlVTl7dZpopefdPsa82gEJR4fpzqLjMrYV0MekOvPO8ZG/JF0/GxIY8ODTtw/h hdGC8DRA==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vxmHt-0000000HFO7-32GD; Wed, 04 Mar 2026 13:29:17 +0000 Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 05:29:17 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jan Kara Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christian Brauner , Al Viro , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Ted Tso , "Tigran A. Aivazian" , David Sterba , OGAWA Hirofumi , Muchun Song , Oscar Salvador , David Hildenbrand , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, Benjamin LaHaise , Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/32] bdev: Drop pointless invalidate_mapping_buffers() call Message-ID: References: <20260303101717.27224-1-jack@suse.cz> <20260303103406.4355-53-jack@suse.cz> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 11:36:29AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > On Tue 03-03-26 06:09:03, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > FYI, linux-block only got this patch which is totally messed up. > > Please always send all patches to every list and person, otherwise > > you fill peoples inboxes with unreviewable junk. > > Well, I've CCed on the whole series everybody who was non-trivially > impacted. But there are couple of these trivial "remove effectively dead > code" patches which stand on their own and a lot of people actually prefer > to only get individual patches in such cases. So I don't plan on changing > that but I guess I could have CCed linux-block on the whole series as > buffer_heads are tangentially related to block layer anyway. Ccing people or lists on just part of a series is always broken, don't do that. If you think something is just a FYI only CC the list to cut down the spam.