From: liubaolin <liubaolin12138@163.com>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
tytso@mit.edu, wangguanyu@vivo.com, yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Baolin Liu <liubaolin@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 v2 2/2] ext4: allow clearing mballoc stats through mb_stats
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 15:07:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab93e1b9-93e5-4988-94db-b861dc47abb0@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aecVCWGL3bUFFiBd@li-dc0c254c-257c-11b2-a85c-98b6c1322444.ibm.com>
在 2026/4/21 14:12, Ojaswin Mujoo 写道:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 01:22:31PM +0800, liubaolin wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> I noticed the discussion about where to document the ext4 proc parameter
>> mb_stats.
>> I ran:
>> git grep -n "/proc/fs/ext4" Documentation/
>> and found that ext4 proc parameters are currently documented in both
>> Documentation/admin-guide/ext4.rst and
>> Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst.
>>
>> To be consistent with the existing documentation, I am thinking about
>> documenting mb_stats in both places.
>> If there are no objections, I will send a v3 shortly.
>> Compared with v2,the v3 patch will add the mb_stats documentation to both
>> ext4.rst and proc.rst.
>
> Yes this makes sense to me. Feel free to retain the Reviewed-by since this is
> just a documentation change.
> OK, I will add all the reviewers who helped review my patch with Reviewed-by tags in the v3 version.
>
> Thanks,
> Ojaswin
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Baolin
>>
>>
>>
>> 在 2026/4/21 11:40, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) 写道:
>>> Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Apr 20, 2026, at 03:12, Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 02:34:36PM +0800, Baolin Liu wrote:
>>>>>> From: Baolin Liu <liubaolin@kylinos.cn>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Make /proc/fs/ext4/<dev>/mb_stats writable and clear the runtime
>>>>>> mballoc statistics when 0 is written.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Baolin Liu <liubaolin@kylinos.cn>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>> Hi Baolin, thanks for the changes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems like userspace doesn't have any way to know that writing 0 will
>>>>> clear the that. Well, I guess if you are looking at this file you are
>>>>> anyways debugging kernel code so that should be fine
>>>>
>>>> That could be documented in Documentation/filesystems/ext4/allocators.rst,
>>>> or better would be to add a new file that covers mballoc in more detail.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I started looking for ext4's control knobs for sys-admins in kernel
>>> Documentation where we should ideally document this, and I see those
>>> are declared here..
>>>
>>> Documentation/admin-guide/ext4.rst
>>> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-ext4.rst
>>>
>>> Looking at this and the relevant code, I see all /proc/ entries in ext4
>>> are all readable and sysfs entries for ext4 are mostly the control knobs
>>> which are declared in above admin guide.
>>>
>>> But now this patch adds a control knob to /proc/fs/ext4/<dev>/mb_stats,
>>> to clear the stats :).
>>>
>>> I guess we could have simply documented a new control knob value (e.g.
>>> "2") for clearing the stats via /sys/fs/ext4/<dev>/mb_stats itself or
>>> maybe even having mb_stats_clear file in sysfs wasn't bad either... But
>>> either ways, clearing the stats via the same procfs mb_stats file is not
>>> totally bad and I don't have a strong preference.
>>>
>>>
>>> For documenting this, we can add mb_stats entry under /proc section in
>>> Documentation/admin-guide/ext4.rst and document this change. Something
>>> like -
>>>
>>> mb_stats
>>> reports runtime statistics from multiblock allocator (mballoc),
>>> including allocation request counts, groups scanned,
>>> per-criteria scan hits (cr_p2_aligned, cr_goal_fast,
>>> cr_best_avail, cr_goal_slow, cr_any_free), groups / extents
>>> scanned, goal hits, buddy bitmap generations, and preallocation
>>> usage etc.
>>> Writing 0 to this procfs file resets all counters to zero.
>>>
>>>
>>> -ritesh
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-21 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-19 6:34 [PATCH v2 v2 0/2] add blocks_allocated to mb_stats and clear mb_stats Baolin Liu
2026-04-19 6:34 ` [PATCH v2 v2 1/2] ext4: add blocks_allocated to mb_stats output Baolin Liu
2026-04-19 9:19 ` Andreas Dilger
2026-04-20 9:13 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-04-19 6:34 ` [PATCH v2 v2 2/2] ext4: allow clearing mballoc stats through mb_stats Baolin Liu
2026-04-19 9:23 ` Andreas Dilger
2026-04-20 9:12 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-04-20 18:28 ` Andreas Dilger
2026-04-21 3:40 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-04-21 5:22 ` liubaolin
2026-04-21 6:12 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-04-21 7:07 ` liubaolin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ab93e1b9-93e5-4988-94db-b861dc47abb0@163.com \
--to=liubaolin12138@163.com \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liubaolin@kylinos.cn \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wangguanyu@vivo.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox