From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, zlang@kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
jack@suse.cz, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yizhang089@gmail.com,
yangerkun@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] generic/790: test post-EOF gap zeroing persistence
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 09:09:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aetreLr6tt1Vb-GJ@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260424092228.1396658-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 05:22:28PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
>
> Test that extending a file past a non-block-aligned EOF correctly
> zero-fills the gap [old_EOF, block_boundary), and that this zeroing
> persists through a filesystem shutdown+remount cycle.
>
> Stale data beyond EOF can persist on disk when append write data blocks
> are flushed before the on-disk file size update, or when concurrent
> append writeback and mmap writes persist non-zero data past EOF.
> Subsequent post-EOF operations (append write, fallocate, truncate up)
> must zero-fill and persist the gap to prevent exposing stale data.
>
> The test pollutes the file's last physical block (via FIEMAP + raw
> device write) with a sentinel pattern beyond i_size, then performs each
> extend operation and verifies the gap is zeroed both in memory and on
> disk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> - Add _require_no_realtime to prevent testing on XFS realtime devices,
> where file data may reside on $SCRATCH_RTDEV.
> - Add _exclude_fs btrfs since FIEMAP returns logical addresses, not
> physical device offsets, writing to these offsets on $SCRATCH_DEV
> would corrupt the filesystem in multi-device setups. Besides, since
> btrfs doesn't support shutdown right now, we can support it later.
> - Add -v flag to od in _check_gap_zero() to prevent line folding of
> identical consecutive lines.
> - Add expected_new_sz parameter to _test_eof_zeroing(), verify file
> size was not rolled back after shutdown+remount cycle, and also drop
> the unnecessary file size check before the shutdown as well.
> - Clarify the comment regarding when stale data beyond EOF can persist.
>
Thanks for the tweaks. This all LGTM from a review standpoint. I gave it
a quick test on latest master and I see a few failures in a couple runs:
- On XFS (mkfs defaults) I saw one unexpected i_size failure and one
zeroing failure, both on write extension fwiw.
- On ext4 I saw a few unexpected i_size failures (both with mkfs
defaults and 1k block size).
I haven't dug into anything beyond that. Does this match what you're
seeing on current kernels or are these unexpected failures?
Brian
> tests/generic/790 | 164 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/generic/790.out | 4 ++
> 2 files changed, 168 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/generic/790
> create mode 100644 tests/generic/790.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/generic/790 b/tests/generic/790
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..2adc06f8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/790
> @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2026 Huawei. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test No. 790
> +#
> +# Test that extending a file past a non-block-aligned EOF correctly zero-fills
> +# the gap [old_EOF, block_boundary), and that this zeroing persists through a
> +# filesystem shutdown+remount cycle.
> +#
> +# Stale data beyond EOF can persist on disk when:
> +# 1) append write data blocks are flushed before the on-disk file size update,
> +# and the system crashes in this window.
> +# 2) concurrent append writeback and mmap writes persist non-zero data past EOF.
> +#
> +# Subsequent post-EOF operations (append write, fallocate, truncate up) must
> +# zero-fill and persist the gap to prevent exposing stale data.
> +#
> +# The test pollutes the file's last physical block (via FIEMAP + raw device
> +# write) with a sentinel pattern beyond i_size, then performs each extend
> +# operation and verifies the gap is zeroed both in memory and on disk.
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +_begin_fstest auto quick rw shutdown
> +
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +_require_scratch
> +_require_block_device $SCRATCH_DEV
> +_require_no_realtime
> +_require_scratch_shutdown
> +_require_metadata_journaling $SCRATCH_DEV
> +
> +# FIEMAP on Btrfs returns logical addresses within the filesystem's address
> +# space, not physical device offsets. Writing to these offsets on $SCRATCH_DEV
> +# would corrupt the filesystem in multi-device setups.
> +_exclude_fs btrfs
> +
> +_require_xfs_io_command "fiemap"
> +_require_xfs_io_command "falloc"
> +_require_xfs_io_command "pwrite"
> +_require_xfs_io_command "truncate"
> +_require_xfs_io_command "sync_range"
> +
> +# Check that gap region [offset, offset+nbytes) is entirely zero
> +_check_gap_zero()
> +{
> + local file="$1"
> + local offset="$2"
> + local nbytes="$3"
> + local label="$4"
> + local data
> + local stripped
> +
> + data=$(od -A n -t x1 -v -j $offset -N $nbytes "$file" 2>/dev/null)
> +
> + # Remove whitespace and check if any byte is non-zero
> + stripped=$(printf '%s' "$data" | tr -d ' \n\t')
> + if [ -n "$stripped" ] && ! echo "$stripped" | grep -qE "^0+$"; then
> + echo "FAIL: non-zero data in gap [$offset,$((offset + nbytes))) $label"
> + _hexdump -N $((offset + nbytes)) "$file"
> + return 1
> + fi
> + return 0
> +}
> +
> +# Get the physical block offset (in bytes) of the file's first block on device
> +_get_phys_offset()
> +{
> + local file="$1"
> + local fiemap_output
> + local phys_blk
> +
> + fiemap_output=$($XFS_IO_PROG -r -c "fiemap -v" "$file" 2>/dev/null)
> + phys_blk=$(echo "$fiemap_output" | _filter_xfs_io_fiemap | head -1 | awk '{print $3}')
> + if [ -z "$phys_blk" ]; then
> + echo ""
> + return
> + fi
> + # Convert 512-byte blocks to bytes
> + echo $((phys_blk * 512))
> +}
> +
> +_test_eof_zeroing()
> +{
> + local test_name="$1"
> + local extend_cmd="$2"
> + local expected_new_sz="$3"
> + local file=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile_${test_name}
> +
> + echo "$test_name" | tee -a $seqres.full
> +
> + # Compute non-block-aligned EOF offset
> + local gap_bytes=16
> + local eof_offset=$((blksz - gap_bytes))
> +
> + # Step 1: Write one full block to ensure the filesystem allocates a
> + # physical block for the file instead of using inline data.
> + $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0x5a 0 $blksz" -c fsync \
> + "$file" >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +
> + # Step 2: Get physical block offset on device via FIEMAP
> + local phys_offset
> + phys_offset=$(_get_phys_offset "$file")
> + if [ -z "$phys_offset" ]; then
> + _fail "$test_name: failed to get physical block offset via fiemap"
> + fi
> +
> + # Step 3: Truncate file to non-block-aligned size and fsync.
> + # The on-disk region [eof_offset, blksz) may or may not be
> + # zeroed by the filesystem at this point.
> + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "truncate $eof_offset" -c fsync \
> + "$file" >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +
> + # Step 4: Unmount and restore the physical block to all-0x5a on disk.
> + # This bypasses the kernel's pagecache EOF-zeroing to ensure
> + # the stale pattern is present on disk. Then remount.
> + _scratch_unmount
> + $XFS_IO_PROG -d -c "pwrite -S 0x5a $phys_offset $blksz" \
> + $SCRATCH_DEV >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> + _scratch_mount >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +
> + # Step 5: Execute the extend operation.
> + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "$extend_cmd" "$file" >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +
> + # Step 6: Verify gap [eof_offset, blksz) is zeroed BEFORE shutdown
> + _check_gap_zero "$file" $eof_offset $gap_bytes "before shutdown" || return 1
> +
> + # Step 7: Sync the extended range and shutdown the filesystem with
> + # journal flush. This persists the file size extending, and
> + # the filesystem should persist the zeroed data in the gap
> + # range as well.
> + if [ "$extend_cmd" != "${extend_cmd#pwrite}" ]; then
> + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "sync_range -w $blksz $blksz" \
> + "$file" >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> + fi
> + _scratch_shutdown -f
> +
> + # Step 8: Remount and verify gap is still zeroed
> + _scratch_cycle_mount
> +
> + # Verify file size was not rolled back after shutdown+remount
> + local sz
> + sz=$(stat -c %s "$file")
> + if [ "$sz" -ne "$expected_new_sz" ]; then
> + _fail "$test_name: file size rolled back after shutdown+remount: $sz != $expected_new_sz"
> + fi
> +
> + _check_gap_zero "$file" $eof_offset $gap_bytes "after shutdown+remount" || return 1
> +}
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +blksz=$(_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT)
> +
> +# Test three variants of EOF-extending operations
> +_test_eof_zeroing "append_write" "pwrite -S 0x42 $blksz $blksz" $((blksz * 2))
> +_test_eof_zeroing "truncate_up" "truncate $((blksz * 2))" $((blksz * 2))
> +_test_eof_zeroing "fallocate" "falloc $blksz $blksz" $((blksz * 2))
> +
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/generic/790.out b/tests/generic/790.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..e5e2cc09
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/790.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> +QA output created by 790
> +append_write
> +truncate_up
> +fallocate
> --
> 2.52.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-24 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-24 9:22 [PATCH v2] generic/790: test post-EOF gap zeroing persistence Zhang Yi
2026-04-24 13:09 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2026-04-25 3:06 ` Zhang Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aetreLr6tt1Vb-GJ@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yizhang089@gmail.com \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox