From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B50543A963A; Mon, 25 May 2026 07:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779692982; cv=none; b=MZwkliTKR+8uGfXMhJ+cfpjLCuPfiN1XfR8l1Ps6jb9fyfJQ4jX1SsVsVgRmNT7sN+VT3lzpBcHvIf1723fEpWRT7jVVxng+V1BnN7DNt+JyUW2SfTVC2uSCjx/6vDTRUk6Usnv1A+y0zJSPAt6hs+v/meclutYJX9JYIfdsYws= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779692982; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IiDlTcyO2SJCYRMFYXQ7ytnIRPuE9RU5ODmFZ8AgMmw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Vut/PQtBYD+H7I5kjaftCKZ6xg5KaggY0vfullz9HcjypV0+wg9A18+YQUIAiKYUrBbdOP2v8aKTL1nnqlzMwGbyizrIu2ndkshWvrMtcr293nC/tgSlZjArp3jiy3i9J8c2FhTBk08BHn2BfOfoWP6mWUkxJt2jJywajnT7eJA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=CUzhw2KT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="CUzhw2KT" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=syRvi07sgur66zfha9AI/lR4MWGyK8TIBCUS+OGxqFY=; b=CUzhw2KTZ4UKg6JJLG5dangK8J Q3ktpouecNWzjHpJe94UQahLJxM/3Db1lfDqSytbmItYe+lMJsCCdK0MQxbSXRNhcOxAGratAzAIB 0qy12kFFfdjr2WpaRsh08W9CXxnyKVavYJHWHVpI2mYCyKRgmORPzfWYmEGRShdtlXkMS9LqNOxvk 3U/sNUoBt/IAFKCio2uziR0yfOwLq1mmdX5+hMTVdCavWFBfrWiC4EhTj8Y9pVXe9s5G/5TQ9sQkS BIAcVuNYZPt3EdpB13WSA8Nru44ke/NsPMxoFNb/jYVkXvSdL6AlR2Q/Mz0A6k+MBLu28PtNNZ9DS EqbS9Y9g==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wRPRU-0000000GV0l-0me5; Mon, 25 May 2026 07:09:40 +0000 Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 00:09:40 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Anand Jain Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, amir73il@gmail.com, zlang@redhat.com, hch@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/10] fstests: add test for inotify isolation on cloned devices Message-ID: References: <1c60be06ce79778404079c8b1c1d2e09f64cb38e.1779367627.git.asj@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1c60be06ce79778404079c8b1c1d2e09f64cb38e.1779367627.git.asj@kernel.org> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html > diff --git a/common/config b/common/config > index 4fd4c2c8af11..605a57947a40 100644 > --- a/common/config > +++ b/common/config > @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ export BTRFS_MAP_LOGICAL_PROG=$(type -P btrfs-map-logical) > export PARTED_PROG="$(type -P parted)" > export XFS_PROPERTY_PROG="$(type -P xfs_property)" > export FSCRYPTCTL_PROG="$(type -P fscryptctl)" > +export INOTIFYWAIT_PROG="$(type -P inotifywait)" Usually we try to split infrastructure changes like this out into separate patches. Also any reason to rely on the obsolete inotify instead of fsnotify?