Re: [GIT PULL] Ext3 latency fixes

Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-04T20:54:56Z

On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 19:34:12 +0200
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:

> > Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple.
>
> It's really not that simple, otherwise the schedulers would be much
> simpler. It's pretty easy to get good latency if you disregard any
> throughput concerns,

I'd be very interested in a scheduler like that.....
How much work would it be to make it ?

(if nothing else it would be a good number to have "should be within
50% of the perfect one for the tradeoff")

--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org