linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jmoyer@redhat.com,
	eshishki@redhat.com, sandeen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add discard/nodiscard mount option for ext3
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:15:23 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1007121813100.2733@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1007121802590.13784@localhost>

On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Lukas Czerner wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> 
> > On 07/12/2010 11:19 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > Those mount option has the same meaning as in ext4 file system. It
> > > > provide a way to enable/disable file system's trim support. The trim
> > > > support is off by default, thus nodiscard option is not actually
> > > > necessary.
> > >    I kind of miss why ext3 should have a 'discard' mount option. When
> > > user calls DISCARD ioctl on the filesystem, then he probably wants
> > > discard to be performed.
> > > 
> > > 								Honza
> > > 
> > 
> > Sorry I misunderstood your original question.
> > 
> > One reason that you might want to have a "discard" option is to allow a system
> > admin to mount without barriers to protect flaky hardware (we have had some
> > mixed results for example). As you say, the user probably wants to have the
> > ioctl do the discard and should be reasonable for doing it only on solid
> > devices,
> 
> The question is what in does on device other than SSD. I know it does
> not harm the deivce, but is there some kernel logic preventing the trim
> command to be send to device that does not support it ? I hope so.
> 

Yes, there is a check whether device support trim in blkdev_issue_discard
code.

-Lukas

> 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Ric
> > 
> 

-- 

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-12 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-07 13:18 Ext3: batched discard support Lukas Czerner
2010-07-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add discard/nodiscard mount option for ext3 Lukas Czerner
2010-07-12 15:19   ` Jan Kara
2010-07-12 15:26     ` Lukas Czerner
2010-07-12 15:50       ` Jan Kara
2010-07-12 16:01         ` Lukas Czerner
2010-07-12 15:27     ` Ric Wheeler
2010-07-12 16:03     ` Ric Wheeler
2010-07-12 16:05       ` Lukas Czerner
2010-07-12 16:15         ` Lukas Czerner [this message]
2010-07-12 18:07           ` Eric Sandeen
2010-07-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] Add batched discard support " Lukas Czerner
2010-07-12 15:28   ` Jan Kara
2010-07-12 15:58     ` Lukas Czerner
2010-07-12 19:57       ` Jan Kara
2010-07-13 15:55         ` Lukas Czerner
2010-07-07 19:14 ` Ext3: batched discard support Greg Freemyer
2010-07-09  8:53   ` Lukas Czerner
2010-07-09 10:18     ` Ric Wheeler
2010-07-12 15:09       ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1007121813100.2733@localhost \
    --to=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=eshishki@redhat.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).