From: "Lukáš Czerner" <lczerner@redhat.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] e2fsck: optimize pass 5 for CPU utilization
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:59:12 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1211261257030.18234@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1353803794-11593-7-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:36:34 -0500
> From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> To: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> Subject: [PATCH 6/6] e2fsck: optimize pass 5 for CPU utilization
>
> Add a fast past optimization in e2fsck's pass 5 for the common case
> where the block bitmap is correct. The optimization works by
> extracting each block group's block allocation bitmap into a memory
> buffer, and comparing it with the expected allocation bitmap using
> memcmp(). If it matches, then we can just update the free block
> counts and be on our way, and skip checking each bit individually.
>
> Addresses-Google-Bug: #7534813
Looks good, we can always move the discard operation at the end of
the function before we free the bitmap, but that's further
optimization.
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
> ---
> e2fsck/pass5.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/e2fsck/pass5.c b/e2fsck/pass5.c
> index 8312fe0..5aff55c 100644
> --- a/e2fsck/pass5.c
> +++ b/e2fsck/pass5.c
> @@ -212,6 +212,12 @@ static void check_block_bitmaps(e2fsck_t ctx)
> int cmp_block = 0;
> int redo_flag = 0;
> blk64_t super_blk, old_desc_blk, new_desc_blk;
> + char *actual_buf, *bitmap_buf;
> +
> + actual_buf = (char *) e2fsck_allocate_memory(ctx, fs->blocksize,
> + "actual bitmap buffer");
> + bitmap_buf = (char *) e2fsck_allocate_memory(ctx, fs->blocksize,
> + "bitmap block buffer");
>
> clear_problem_context(&pctx);
> free_array = (unsigned int *) e2fsck_allocate_memory(ctx,
> @@ -259,11 +265,53 @@ redo_counts:
> for (i = B2C(fs->super->s_first_data_block);
> i < ext2fs_blocks_count(fs->super);
> i += EXT2FS_CLUSTER_RATIO(fs)) {
> + int first_block_in_bg = (B2C(i) -
> + B2C(fs->super->s_first_data_block)) %
> + fs->super->s_clusters_per_group == 0;
> + int n, nbytes = fs->super->s_clusters_per_group / 8;
> +
> actual = ext2fs_fast_test_block_bitmap2(ctx->block_found_map, i);
>
> + /*
> + * Try to optimize pass5 by extracting a bitmap block
> + * as expected from what we have on disk, and then
> + * comparing the two. If they are identical, then
> + * update the free block counts and go on to the next
> + * block group. This is much faster than doing the
> + * individual bit-by-bit comparison. The one downside
> + * is that this doesn't work if we are asking e2fsck
> + * to do a discard operation.
> + */
> + if (!first_block_in_bg ||
> + (group == (int)fs->group_desc_count - 1) ||
> + (ctx->options & E2F_OPT_DISCARD))
> + goto no_optimize;
> +
> + retval = ext2fs_get_block_bitmap_range2(ctx->block_found_map,
> + B2C(i), fs->super->s_clusters_per_group,
> + actual_buf);
> + if (retval)
> + goto no_optimize;
> + if (ext2fs_bg_flags_test(fs, group, EXT2_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT))
> + memset(bitmap_buf, 0, nbytes);
> + else {
> + retval = ext2fs_get_block_bitmap_range2(fs->block_map,
> + B2C(i), fs->super->s_clusters_per_group,
> + bitmap_buf);
> + if (retval)
> + goto no_optimize;
> + }
> + if (memcmp(actual_buf, bitmap_buf, nbytes) != 0)
> + goto no_optimize;
> + n = ext2fs_bitcount(actual_buf, nbytes);
> + group_free = fs->super->s_clusters_per_group - n;
> + free_blocks += group_free;
> + i += fs->super->s_clusters_per_group - 1;
> + goto next_group;
> + no_optimize:
> +
> if (skip_group) {
> - if ((B2C(i) - B2C(fs->super->s_first_data_block)) %
> - fs->super->s_clusters_per_group == 0) {
> + if (first_block_in_bg) {
> super_blk = 0;
> old_desc_blk = 0;
> new_desc_blk = 0;
> @@ -401,6 +449,7 @@ redo_counts:
> if (!bitmap && i >= first_free)
> e2fsck_discard_blocks(ctx, first_free,
> (i - first_free) + 1);
> + next_group:
> first_free = ext2fs_blocks_count(fs->super);
>
> free_array[group] = group_free;
> @@ -475,6 +524,8 @@ redo_counts:
> }
> errout:
> ext2fs_free_mem(&free_array);
> + ext2fs_free_mem(&actual_buf);
> + ext2fs_free_mem(&bitmap_buf);
> }
>
> static void check_inode_bitmaps(e2fsck_t ctx)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-26 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-25 0:36 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Optimize e2fsck for large file systems Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-25 0:36 ` [PATCH 1/6] libext2fs: optimize rb_set_bmap_range() Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-26 9:40 ` Lukáš Czerner
2012-11-26 13:36 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-25 0:36 ` [PATCH 2/6] e2fsck: optimize pass1 for CPU time Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-26 10:06 ` Lukáš Czerner
2012-11-25 0:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] libext2fs: add ext2fs_bitcount() function Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-26 10:30 ` Lukáš Czerner
2012-11-26 14:06 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-26 14:10 ` [PATCH 3/6 -v2] " Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-26 14:12 ` [PATCH 4/6 -v3] " Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-25 0:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] libext2fs: optimize rb_get_bmap_range() Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-26 10:46 ` Lukáš Czerner
2012-11-25 0:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] libext2fs: optimize rb_get_bmap_range() for mostly allocated bmaps Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-26 11:22 ` Lukáš Czerner
2012-11-26 14:17 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-25 0:36 ` [PATCH 6/6] e2fsck: optimize pass 5 for CPU utilization Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-26 11:59 ` Lukáš Czerner [this message]
2012-11-25 5:09 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] Optimize e2fsck for large file systems Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-26 9:19 ` Lukáš Czerner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1211261257030.18234@localhost \
--to=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).