From: "Lukáš Czerner" <lczerner@redhat.com>
To: "Lukáš Czerner" <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix overhead calculation in bigalloc filesystem (Re: ... )
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:50:03 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1302211346240.19354@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1302211335390.19354@localhost>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2244 bytes --]
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
..snip...
>
> Hi Zheng,
>
> thanks for the review. I know about the other issues and I'm trying
> to resolve those as well. Right now I have a patch which includes
> the changes ext4_calculate_overhead() you've described below and more,
> but even with this I still see some problems remaining.
>
> Hopefully will send another patch soon.
>
> Thanks!
> -Lukas
>
> >
> > Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix overhead calculation in bigalloc filesystem
> >
> > From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
> >
> > ext4_calculate_overhead() should compute the overhead and stash it in
> > sbi->s_overhead. But we miss use EXT4_B2C() to calculate the number of
> > clusters before first_data_block and the number of journal blocks. This
> > commit use EXT4_NUM_B2C() instead of EXT4_B2C() to calculate the
> > overhead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
> > Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
> > ---
> > fs/ext4/super.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > index 3d4fb81..6165558 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > @@ -3219,7 +3219,7 @@ int ext4_calculate_overhead(struct super_block *sb)
> > /*
> > * All of the blocks before first_data_block are overhead
> > */
> > - overhead = EXT4_B2C(sbi, le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block));
> > + overhead = EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block));
...except this. I do not think this is right because we do not skip
the first cluster right ? We're still using it, but we can never use
the block before es->s_first_data_block. Please correct me if I am
wrong.
> >
> > /*
> > * Add the overhead found in each block group
> > @@ -3235,7 +3235,7 @@ int ext4_calculate_overhead(struct super_block *sb)
> > }
> > /* Add the journal blocks as well */
> > if (sbi->s_journal)
> > - overhead += EXT4_B2C(sbi, sbi->s_journal->j_maxlen);
> > + overhead += EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, sbi->s_journal->j_maxlen);
This I already have in my patch I'm testing right now. And as I said
there are other places where we misuse EXT4_B2C().
-Lukas
> >
> > sbi->s_overhead = overhead;
> > smp_wmb();
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-21 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-21 8:01 [PATCH] ext4: fix free clusters calculation in bigalloc filesystem Lukas Czerner
2013-02-21 12:15 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix overhead calculation in bigalloc filesystem (Re: ... ) Zheng Liu
2013-02-21 12:40 ` Lukáš Czerner
2013-02-21 12:50 ` Lukáš Czerner [this message]
2013-02-21 12:52 ` Lukáš Czerner
2013-02-21 13:49 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-21 14:56 ` Lukáš Czerner
2013-02-22 3:03 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-22 4:05 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-22 8:04 ` Lukáš Czerner
2013-02-22 13:18 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-22 15:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-22 16:26 ` Zheng Liu
2013-03-24 12:29 ` [PATCH] ext4: fold ext4_generic_write_end into ext4_write_end Zheng Liu
2013-03-25 0:07 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-21 13:12 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix overhead calculation in bigalloc filesystem (Re: ... ) Zheng Liu
2013-02-22 5:10 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix free clusters calculation in bigalloc filesystem Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-22 7:57 ` Lukáš Czerner
2013-02-22 8:39 ` [PATCH v2] " Lukas Czerner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1302211346240.19354@localhost \
--to=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).