linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lukáš Czerner" <lczerner@redhat.com>
To: "Lukáš Czerner" <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix overhead calculation in bigalloc filesystem (Re: ... )
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:50:03 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1302211346240.19354@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1302211335390.19354@localhost>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2244 bytes --]

On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Lukáš Czerner wrote:

..snip...

> 
> Hi Zheng,
> 
> thanks for the review. I know about the other issues and I'm trying
> to resolve those as well. Right now I have a patch which includes
> the changes ext4_calculate_overhead() you've described below and more,
> but even with this I still see some problems remaining.
> 
> Hopefully will send another patch soon.
> 
> Thanks!
> -Lukas
> 
> > 
> > Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix overhead calculation in bigalloc filesystem
> > 
> > From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
> > 
> > ext4_calculate_overhead() should compute the overhead and stash it in
> > sbi->s_overhead.  But we miss use EXT4_B2C() to calculate the number of
> > clusters before first_data_block and the number of journal blocks.  This
> > commit use EXT4_NUM_B2C() instead of EXT4_B2C() to calculate the
> > overhead.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
> > Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
> > ---
> >  fs/ext4/super.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > index 3d4fb81..6165558 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > @@ -3219,7 +3219,7 @@ int ext4_calculate_overhead(struct super_block *sb)
> >  	/*
> >  	 * All of the blocks before first_data_block are overhead
> >  	 */
> > -	overhead = EXT4_B2C(sbi, le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block));
> > +	overhead = EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block));

...except this. I do not think this is right because we do not skip
the first cluster right ? We're still using it, but we can never use
the block before es->s_first_data_block. Please correct me if I am
wrong.


> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Add the overhead found in each block group
> > @@ -3235,7 +3235,7 @@ int ext4_calculate_overhead(struct super_block *sb)
> >  	}
> >  	/* Add the journal blocks as well */
> >  	if (sbi->s_journal)
> > -		overhead += EXT4_B2C(sbi, sbi->s_journal->j_maxlen);
> > +		overhead += EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, sbi->s_journal->j_maxlen);

This I already have in my patch I'm testing right now. And as I said
there are other places where we misuse EXT4_B2C().

-Lukas

> >  
> >  	sbi->s_overhead = overhead;
> >  	smp_wmb();
> > 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-21 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-21  8:01 [PATCH] ext4: fix free clusters calculation in bigalloc filesystem Lukas Czerner
2013-02-21 12:15 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix overhead calculation in bigalloc filesystem (Re: ... ) Zheng Liu
2013-02-21 12:40   ` Lukáš Czerner
2013-02-21 12:50     ` Lukáš Czerner [this message]
2013-02-21 12:52       ` Lukáš Czerner
2013-02-21 13:49         ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-21 14:56           ` Lukáš Czerner
2013-02-22  3:03             ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-22  4:05               ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-22  8:04                 ` Lukáš Czerner
2013-02-22 13:18                 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-22 15:20                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-22 16:26                     ` Zheng Liu
2013-03-24 12:29                     ` [PATCH] ext4: fold ext4_generic_write_end into ext4_write_end Zheng Liu
2013-03-25  0:07                       ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-21 13:12     ` [PATCH] ext4: fix overhead calculation in bigalloc filesystem (Re: ... ) Zheng Liu
2013-02-22  5:10 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix free clusters calculation in bigalloc filesystem Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-22  7:57   ` Lukáš Czerner
2013-02-22  8:39 ` [PATCH v2] " Lukas Czerner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1302211346240.19354@localhost \
    --to=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).