From: "Lukáš Czerner" <lczerner@redhat.com>
To: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: enable punch hole for bigalloc
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:29:32 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1312021225080.3930@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385820218-4673-1-git-send-email-wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013, Zheng Liu wrote:
> Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 22:03:38 +0800
> From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
> Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] ext4: enable punch hole for bigalloc
>
> From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
>
> After applied this commit (d23142c6), ext4 has supported punch hole for
> a file system with bigalloc feature. But we forgot to enable it. This
> commit fixes it.
Hi,
I actually send out this patch as a part of the series which
implemented it and it even got review for Jan Kara
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg37914.html
however Ted noticed that xfstest shared/298 failed, but that was not
due to bug in the code,but rather the problem with the test itself,
see:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/18/329
So I am not sure why it was not merged a long time ago. Ted probably
just overlooked my response.
Ted can we have my or this patch (they are the same) merged ?
Thanks!
-Lukas
>
> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
> Cc: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 0757634..2d73587 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -3513,11 +3513,6 @@ int ext4_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length)
> if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> - if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_cluster_ratio > 1) {
> - /* TODO: Add support for bigalloc file systems */
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> - }
> -
> trace_ext4_punch_hole(inode, offset, length);
>
> /*
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-02 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-30 14:03 [PATCH] ext4: enable punch hole for bigalloc Zheng Liu
2013-12-02 11:29 ` Lukáš Czerner [this message]
2013-12-02 15:01 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1312021225080.3930@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wenqing.lz@taobao.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox