On Thu, 17 Apr 2014, Namjae Jeon wrote: > Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 07:29:18 +0900 > From: Namjae Jeon > To: Theodore Ts'o > Cc: linux-ext4 , > Lukáš Czerner > Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ext4: fix ZERO_RANGE test failure in data journalling > mode > > From: Namjae Jeon > > xfstests generic/091 is failing when mounting ext4 with data=journal. > I think that this regression is same problem that occurred prior to collapse > range issue. So ZERO RANGE also need to call ext4_force_commit as > collapse range. > > Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon > Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan > --- > fs/ext4/extents.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c > index f386dd6..a64242f 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c > @@ -4742,6 +4742,13 @@ static long ext4_zero_range(struct file *file, loff_t offset, > > trace_ext4_zero_range(inode, offset, len, mode); > > + /* Call ext4_force_commit to flush all data in case of data=journal. */ > + if (ext4_should_journal_data(inode)) { > + ret = ext4_force_commit(inode->i_sb); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } Hi, it makes sense. But I have a question, maybe I do not understand it correctly but what protect us from other writes coming in after we force the commit ? -Lukas > + > /* > * Write out all dirty pages to avoid race conditions > * Then release them. >