From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13AF92D12F3 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=18.9.28.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784822991; cv=none; b=Lw5Wr44BgOPk+wgD/yo5iXb9dXK/W1oXT4qNHlDWJoDIioYLSIOxj4ezD9ej0umLVbw6rlDrrTUOG2xl+o1dj3b2wjvrM8o2EtnCewRTTYKTswkYyvQ92S8FpM6FjuAf6xqytpQT9xARdZG2cw02M/f3SBjddSLQHq7jPjuwdoU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784822991; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Nv7jWoPQGvh+5jzmo0kxcpirOn2hP9mjpbJcgIziip4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=a6bu/E4FFFMPW2bgVaQV1gr2LX3hWrz2xUTyVlwvQ80LLv/e7GpPzU+7Jnf8ZdlDC6r/m5+2QUqDGj6uZ7XzfE+vFv0/WrKRPC5JNWbuVQxT0z1G71HcskfGh4NEC4D7aUrs47/XzhzDPR99sSDfY7Dp4FFBAibSXEB7g329Wa4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=mit.edu; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=mit.edu; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mit.edu header.i=@mit.edu header.b=EhmGG5WY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=18.9.28.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=mit.edu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=mit.edu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mit.edu header.i=@mit.edu header.b="EhmGG5WY" Received: from macsyma.thunk.org (pool-108-26-156-127.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [108.26.156.127]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 66NG9MfQ006977 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:09:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mit.edu; s=outgoing; t=1784822965; bh=alaeQZLNPhmSTF7zpHY3XpjcKZarabGNzK/9NRZA0lQ=; h=Date:From:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=EhmGG5WYFZ8I4343u61PucOxh7OuB0+3+SLgsPzFdJtP12VJ9UqNo03v6DSuc7Sr9 6RQcFi2PKlGcmrvMTHW5LpNMQNcYxfwOGvGftglpVL6HoJPmvg1vpT+rFDVChlVXZu FOWQkc5MoOvL4DtDdF9MiQ8YuSQ61+O9kwBIl8jalTOVGpvWEk4m7gXy+fzC1cI36S nYjZ3n1tS52amlT3xnZ4YoEdEugWcwKAAX2xUyee6aXUwW5xcjGs/rfQQElr/2DXTv XruvriZ/IogM9Tda00Lww0hrkLQdGrxhFCNd64S7WtHU3B2H94xReCLMbCtErO7nU6 I/ETzYdheSwoA== Received: by macsyma.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id B79FBBD1D38; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:08:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:08:21 -0400 From: "Theodore Tso" To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Joanne Koong , changfengnan@bytedance.com, Christian Brauner , Carlos Maiolino , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iomap: decouple simple direct I/O reads from iomap_dio_rw Message-ID: References: <20260722124931.3159664-1-hch@lst.de> <20260722124931.3159664-3-hch@lst.de> <20260723045347.GA6641@lst.de> <20260723151021.GC7380@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260723151021.GC7380@frogsfrogsfrogs> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 08:10:21AM -0500, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Yes. Sashiko also reported that yesterday and I replied with a patch, > > but I now noticed the report and thus my reply only went to me, > > a sashiko-review list and Ted, but not everone else or the lists. > > > > WTF? > > Sashiko doesn't email the lists by default, and I don't think we want to > turn that on for the fsdevel firehose. Whether or not the review goes to a mailing list is up to each subsystem to determine. Some people have violently objected to the review going to the mailing list, which is why it's optional. I have asked to have ext4 reviews to be cc'ed to the linux-ext4 list[1]. It would be up to the VFS maintainers whether or not we want to enable it for linux-fsdevel. [1] https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/pull/365 The XFS maintainers can request if patches cc'ed to linux-fs should get reviewed and sent back to authors and/or the maintainers and/or the linux-fs mailing list. You can either ask the Sashiko devs to edit the email_policy.toml file, or you can send a pull request yourself. - Ted