From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 941412F260C; Tue, 1 Sep 2026 15:42:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788277373; cv=none; b=HGQUSnp3SZ6oyrYyXhE8EhcsKVECHw+g7qGaXjZmwNjB2kiibEBL+qUKRGMszPVrWOICjFRhCnbPhAdssDoO799PkMPYTwc4fdlV1aXJbIctx/EO2JRPbxZ4OkgQm9tvdck/2XxwraQi71PEYncv8F69VWFSdLQ4nqYEDdrUUQk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788277373; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Lwda+vNFe4ut/8+vl2HRP1Ndz6kdapXQrACpCrKr0FI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lWVqsW27X1RHIpK90d91nNfm2A+RAPkrno8IRZl7yZGHWolLtqqsb1SpJDtI57nbGHzjqJgLO2CPmJbgcs0rGOtODjZfujvUBXJx2Nyy8EuCQiYbk3LV2c4+aqTGAjgUpYJUESsYGFPK6Ri+EfTgjUNDJsCDtTsESztcHJEre4o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UgXsbapB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UgXsbapB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B10AB1F000E9; Tue, 1 Sep 2026 15:42:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788277372; bh=kwmt/CmpLnrqG0C6TaQUHP9mSrd7dijmNhSSbrv5QBY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=UgXsbapBP/AAW22n9gu40jvjps/Dn8xLvmhlVFxPW85tSuKc/4PPWkZZtJXWH7whC hnndx/4KyLdzhTeEaOYYljBALNvtYoGK8UlX3S3m6JriAXo9ajiTFPHCr2PaOmU4Oh pblvDFLEEAZQRB/QL5/3VNqi5uDwYrsVc/pC0vfy5kj/87Ihd6qVT9Bn/xpAIbNsl/ Jifs33I6hnycFp4GjcQsSZEVlS1X31fOdiWnBs2rWRWdX2TXKpB6T/KSU2FWpdhaVB RlI5QaI/EJ9PAZLBUncPVGb/TLjWzGivV/t5fIdKth1kjQ6h3Ur2tYxsAidgTRbQBR Wan2bv9loXLFg== Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 23:42:44 +0800 From: Zorro Lang To: Anand Jain Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, djwong@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/13] fstests: add _require_fanotify_function Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Anand Jain , fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, djwong@kernel.org References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, Jul 25, 2026 at 03:39:01PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > fanotify support may not be compiled into the kernel. Add > _require_fanotify_function to skip tests when fanotify is disabled. > > Signed-off-by: Anand Jain > --- > common/rc | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc > index 53e5d9d43af6..21b516accdf7 100644 > --- a/common/rc > +++ b/common/rc > @@ -6329,6 +6329,13 @@ _require_max_file_range_blocks() > esac > } > > +_require_fanotify_function() > +{ > + if $FSNOTIFYWAIT_PROG 2>&1 | grep -q "Function not implemented"; then > + _notrun "Need CONFIG_FANOTIFY and CONFIG_FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS to be enabled" > + fi What happens if $FSNOTIFYWAIT_PROG fails with an error other than 'Function not implemented'? Thanks, Zorro > +} > + > _require_fanotify_ioerrors() > { > local x > -- > 2.43.0 >