From: Camille Moncelier <pix@devlife.org>
To: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [ext3] Changes to block device after an ext3 mount point has been remounted readonly
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:26:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <baaef4711002240826t1b447662yf66c980dea1d9d00@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877hq2tyg8.fsf@openvz.org>
> Theoretically some pages may exist after rw=>ro remount
> because of generic race between write/sync, And they will be written
> in by writepage if page already has buffers. This not happen in ext4
> because. Each time it try to perform writepages it try to start_journal
> and this result in EROFS.
> The race bug will be closed some day but new one may appear again.
>
> Let's be honest and change ext3 writepage like follows:
> - check ROFS flag inside write page
> - dump writepage's errors.
>
>
I think I don't understand correctly your patch. For me it seems that
when an ext3 filesystem is remounted ro, some data may not have been
written to disk right ?
But as far as I understand some writes are performed on the journal on
remount-ro, before the ro flag is set. So if writepage comes to play
and write data to disk it my have to update the journal again, no ? If
not it would mean that the journal would reference data that aren't
available on disk ?
Last question, would it be hard to implement a patch that trigger
writepage and wait for completion when remounting read-only (I have no
expertise on filesystems in general, but I tried my best to understand
the ext3 driver)
--
Camille Moncelier
http://devlife.org/
If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would
delete themselves upon execution.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-24 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <baaef4711002180845n29561ccif451fae62e49e520@mail.gmail.com>
2010-02-18 21:41 ` [ext3] Changes to block device after an ext3 mount point has been remounted readonly Andreas Dilger
2010-02-19 7:38 ` Camille Moncelier
2010-02-22 22:32 ` Jan Kara
2010-02-22 23:05 ` Jan Kara
2010-02-22 23:09 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-02-23 8:42 ` Camille Moncelier
2010-02-23 13:55 ` Jan Kara
2010-02-24 16:01 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-02-24 16:26 ` Camille Moncelier [this message]
2010-02-24 16:59 ` Jan Kara
2010-02-24 16:56 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-02 9:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-02 10:01 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-03-02 13:26 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-02 23:10 ` Joel Becker
2010-02-24 16:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-02-24 17:05 ` Jan Kara
2010-02-24 17:26 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-02-24 21:36 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-02 10:29 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=baaef4711002240826t1b447662yf66c980dea1d9d00@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pix@devlife.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).