From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, <tytso@mit.edu>,
<adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>, <jack@suse.cz>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <julia.lawall@inria.fr>,
<yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
<libaokun@huaweicloud.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/17] ext4: add ext4_try_lock_group() to skip busy groups
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 08:37:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf0bda81-5e75-4b5e-aac1-685e4697f513@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aHjL5J3Ui9VMZt2o@li-dc0c254c-257c-11b2-a85c-98b6c1322444.ibm.com>
On 2025/7/17 18:09, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 09:03:11PM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
>> When ext4 allocates blocks, we used to just go through the block groups
>> one by one to find a good one. But when there are tons of block groups
>> (like hundreds of thousands or even millions) and not many have free space
>> (meaning they're mostly full), it takes a really long time to check them
>> all, and performance gets bad. So, we added the "mb_optimize_scan" mount
>> option (which is on by default now). It keeps track of some group lists,
>> so when we need a free block, we can just grab a likely group from the
>> right list. This saves time and makes block allocation much faster.
>>
>> But when multiple processes or containers are doing similar things, like
>> constantly allocating 8k blocks, they all try to use the same block group
>> in the same list. Even just two processes doing this can cut the IOPS in
>> half. For example, one container might do 300,000 IOPS, but if you run two
>> at the same time, the total is only 150,000.
>>
>> Since we can already look at block groups in a non-linear way, the first
>> and last groups in the same list are basically the same for finding a block
>> right now. Therefore, add an ext4_try_lock_group() helper function to skip
>> the current group when it is locked by another process, thereby avoiding
>> contention with other processes. This helps ext4 make better use of having
>> multiple block groups.
>>
>> Also, to make sure we don't skip all the groups that have free space
>> when allocating blocks, we won't try to skip busy groups anymore when
>> ac_criteria is CR_ANY_FREE.
>>
>> Performance test data follows:
>>
>> Test: Running will-it-scale/fallocate2 on CPU-bound containers.
>> Observation: Average fallocate operations per container per second.
>>
>> |CPU: Kunpeng 920 | P80 |
>> |Memory: 512GB |-------------------------|
>> |960GB SSD (0.5GB/s)| base | patched |
>> |-------------------|-------|-----------------|
>> |mb_optimize_scan=0 | 2667 | 4821 (+80.7%) |
>> |mb_optimize_scan=1 | 2643 | 4784 (+81.0%) |
>>
>> |CPU: AMD 9654 * 2 | P96 |
>> |Memory: 1536GB |-------------------------|
>> |960GB SSD (1GB/s) | base | patched |
>> |-------------------|-------|-----------------|
>> |mb_optimize_scan=0 | 3450 | 15371 (+345%) |
>> |mb_optimize_scan=1 | 3209 | 6101 (+90.0%) |
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Hey Baokun, I reviewed some of the patches in v2 but i think that was
> very last moment so I'll add the comments in this series, dont mind the
> copy paste :)
>
> The patch itself looks good, thanks for the changes.
>
> Feel free to add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Sorry for missing your review, I've snowed under with work lately.
Thanks for the review!
Cheers,
Baokun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-19 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-14 13:03 [PATCH v3 00/17] ext4: better scalability for ext4 block allocation Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] ext4: add ext4_try_lock_group() to skip busy groups Baokun Li
2025-07-17 10:09 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-19 0:37 ` Baokun Li [this message]
2025-07-17 22:28 ` Andi Kleen
2025-07-18 3:09 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-07-19 0:29 ` Baokun Li
2025-07-22 20:59 ` Andi Kleen
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] ext4: separate stream goal hits from s_bal_goals for better tracking Baokun Li
2025-07-17 10:29 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-19 1:37 ` Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] ext4: remove unnecessary s_mb_last_start Baokun Li
2025-07-17 10:31 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] ext4: remove unnecessary s_md_lock on update s_mb_last_group Baokun Li
2025-07-17 13:36 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-19 1:54 ` Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] ext4: utilize multiple global goals to reduce contention Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] ext4: get rid of some obsolete EXT4_MB_HINT flags Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] ext4: fix typo in CR_GOAL_LEN_SLOW comment Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] ext4: convert sbi->s_mb_free_pending to atomic_t Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] ext4: merge freed extent with existing extents before insertion Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] ext4: fix zombie groups in average fragment size lists Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] ext4: fix largest free orders lists corruption on mb_optimize_scan switch Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] ext4: factor out __ext4_mb_scan_group() Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] ext4: factor out ext4_mb_might_prefetch() Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] ext4: factor out ext4_mb_scan_group() Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] ext4: convert free groups order lists to xarrays Baokun Li
2025-07-21 11:07 ` Jan Kara
2025-07-21 12:33 ` Baokun Li
2025-07-21 13:45 ` Baokun Li
2025-07-21 18:01 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-07-22 5:58 ` Baokun Li
2025-07-24 3:55 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-24 4:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-07-24 5:20 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-24 11:14 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-24 14:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-24 14:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-07-25 2:28 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-26 0:50 ` Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] ext4: refactor choose group to scan group Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] ext4: implement linear-like traversal across order xarrays Baokun Li
2025-07-15 1:11 ` [PATCH v3 00/17] ext4: better scalability for ext4 block allocation Zhang Yi
2025-07-19 21:45 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bf0bda81-5e75-4b5e-aac1-685e4697f513@huawei.com \
--to=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=libaokun@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).