* [Bug 111961] ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242
2016-02-05 16:16 [Bug 111961] New: ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242 bugzilla-daemon
@ 2016-02-05 16:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-02-05 21:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2016-02-05 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111961
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian <info@dynpages.de> ---
Created attachment 202961
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=202961&action=edit
photo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug 111961] ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242
2016-02-05 16:16 [Bug 111961] New: ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242 bugzilla-daemon
2016-02-05 16:19 ` [Bug 111961] " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2016-02-05 21:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-02-05 23:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2016-02-05 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111961
Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tytso@mit.edu
--- Comment #2 from Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> ---
Can you replicate this problem? Or can you take a look for any messages
starting with EXT4-fs from the kernel (look in /var/log/messages and/or
/var/log/dmesg and/or /var/log/syslog) starting from the time of the system
booting up to the kernel BUG_ON.
The reason for the kernel BUG report was the fact that there was a left over
inode on the orphan inode list. For some reason inode 789844 was left on the
orphan list, and worse, it has a negative link count:
Feb 05 16:22:42 frodo kernel: EXT4-fs (sda3): Inode 789844 (ffff880071df2c00):
orphan list check failed!
Feb 05 16:22:42 frodo kernel: EXT4-fs (sda3): sb orphan head is 789844
Feb 05 16:22:42 frodo kernel: sb_info orphan list:
Feb 05 16:22:42 frodo kernel: inode sda3:789844 at ffff880071df2cc0: mode
100600, nlink -1, next 0
Unfortunately the logs you have included don't shed any light as to how inode
789844 got into this state. When the file system was unmounted, it tripped
over the dead body (as it were), but the question is when and how was the
person killed in the first place (e.g., how did the link count and orphan list
get into this state). Also of interest would be if you have saved the output
from fsck, so we can see what it found when it repaired the file system. It's
possible it was just the in-memory link count which got corrupted, or the
on-disk link count could have been messed up as well; looking at the fsck
output would help determine that.
Thanks!!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug 111961] ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242
2016-02-05 16:16 [Bug 111961] New: ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242 bugzilla-daemon
2016-02-05 16:19 ` [Bug 111961] " bugzilla-daemon
2016-02-05 21:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2016-02-05 23:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-02-05 23:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2016-02-05 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111961
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian <info@dynpages.de> ---
Thank you very much for the fast response! dmesg output from current boot
doesn't include any ext4 message. I don't have a syslog daemon running, but I
grepped for fsck and ext4 on journald, hoping that helps.
The problem just occurred once - after manual recovering from systemd recovery
shell the system boots fine again . I'll check on the logs and will provide
more information in case anything fails again. If you miss something or if I
can help you there get back to me anytime.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug 111961] ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242
2016-02-05 16:16 [Bug 111961] New: ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242 bugzilla-daemon
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2016-02-05 23:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2016-02-05 23:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-02-05 23:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2016-02-05 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111961
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian <info@dynpages.de> ---
Created attachment 203001
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=203001&action=edit
journalctl | grep ext4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug 111961] ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242
2016-02-05 16:16 [Bug 111961] New: ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242 bugzilla-daemon
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2016-02-05 23:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2016-02-05 23:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-02-07 3:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2016-02-05 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111961
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian <info@dynpages.de> ---
Created attachment 203011
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=203011&action=edit
journalctl | grep ext4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug 111961] ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242
2016-02-05 16:16 [Bug 111961] New: ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242 bugzilla-daemon
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2016-02-05 23:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2016-02-07 3:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-02-07 9:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2016-02-07 3:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111961
--- Comment #6 from Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> ---
It would be interesting to get the full output from journalctl for the time
period between Feb 5 11:00 and 21:00 --- but it looks like the root cause was
file system corruption, perhaps caused by a hardware problem. From around
11:14, it looks like an inode table block got zeroed:
Feb 05 11:14:13 frodo kernel: EXT4-fs error (device sda3): ext4_lookup:1584:
inode #790461: comm BrowserBlocking: deleted inode referenced: 789864
Feb 05 11:14:13 frodo kernel: EXT4-fs error (device sda3): ext4_lookup:1584:
inode #790461: comm BrowserBlocking: deleted inode referenced: 789850
Feb 05 11:14:13 frodo kernel: EXT4-fs error (device sda3): ext4_lookup:1584:
inode #790461: comm BrowserBlocking: deleted inode referenced: 789851
Feb 05 11:14:13 frodo kernel: EXT4-fs error (device sda3): ext4_lookup:1584:
inode #790461: comm BrowserBlocking: deleted inode referenced: 789855
It also looks like there was some kind of warning or some other kernel issue
that triggered a kernel warning, but since I only have the output of
"journalctl | grep ext4", we're not seeing the full stack trace or other kernel
warning information:
Feb 05 15:51:25 frodo kernel: [<ffffffffa0197349>] ext4_rename+0x4c9/0x8a0
[ext4]
Feb 05 15:51:25 frodo kernel: [<ffffffffa019773d>] ext4_rename2+0x1d/0x30
[ext4]
And this was *before* the kernel BUG reported at 16:22:
Feb 05 16:22:42 frodo kernel: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/super.c:846!
More concerning is the fact that the file system was fixed after you ran e2fsck
manually, and then it was reported clean:
Feb 05 16:30:38 frodo systemd-fsck[197]: /dev/sda3 contains a file system with
errors, check forced.
Feb 05 16:33:29 frodo systemd-fsck[204]: /dev/sda3: clean, 102074/5718016
files, 4762060/22869846 blocks
It's now marked clean, so you must have run e2fsck between 16:30 and 16:33.
But then at 20:53 the kernel had found more file system corruption, and it
looks like it was another block that got zeroed out:
Feb 05 20:53:39 frodo kernel: EXT4-fs error (device sda3):
ext4_find_dest_de:1809: inode #5513136: block 22029326: comm scp: bad entry in
directory: rec_len is smaller than minimal - offset=0(0), inode=0, rec_len=0,
name_len=0
No one else has reported problems where file system blocks are getting zero'ed
out, so the primary suspect that I would have is a hardware problem. So
before you do anything else, I'd strongly suggest that you make full backups
and that you not store anything precious on the flash device until it's been
resolved (but I suspect it might require replacing the flash device).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug 111961] ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242
2016-02-05 16:16 [Bug 111961] New: ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242 bugzilla-daemon
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2016-02-07 3:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2016-02-07 9:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-02-07 9:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2016-02-07 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111961
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian <info@dynpages.de> ---
Thanks for the warning, but thankfully I've got no important data on that
device and everything backed up. After the issue occurred I recovered my home
partition manually from systemd recovery shell. I've disabled acpi for the SATA
controller - maybe that's causing the problem. I'll keep an eye on the logs,
though. I attach the full journal.
thank you very much for looking into this!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug 111961] ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242
2016-02-05 16:16 [Bug 111961] New: ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242 bugzilla-daemon
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2016-02-07 9:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2016-02-07 9:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-02-10 17:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2016-02-07 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111961
--- Comment #8 from Sebastian <info@dynpages.de> ---
Created attachment 203071
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=203071&action=edit
journald output
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug 111961] ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242
2016-02-05 16:16 [Bug 111961] New: ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242 bugzilla-daemon
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2016-02-07 9:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2016-02-10 17:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-06 20:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-08 10:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2016-02-10 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111961
--- Comment #9 from Sebastian <info@dynpages.de> ---
Hi,
just wanted to let you know that I didn't face any error related to ext4 after
disabling acpi for the sata controller.
This was my change (custom powertop settings runner started by systemd):
# Enable SATA link power management for host0
#echo 'min_power' > '/sys/class/scsi_host/host0/link_power_management_policy';
# Enable SATA link power management for host1
#echo 'min_power' > '/sys/class/scsi_host/host1/link_power_management_policy';
looks fine so far.
best regards
Sebastian
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug 111961] ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242
2016-02-05 16:16 [Bug 111961] New: ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242 bugzilla-daemon
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2016-02-10 17:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2017-03-06 20:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-08 10:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2017-03-06 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111961
--- Comment #10 from Szőgyényi Gábor (szg0000@freemail.hu) ---
Please try to reproduce this bug with latest kernel image.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug 111961] ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242
2016-02-05 16:16 [Bug 111961] New: ext4 umount - invalid opcode with PLEXTOR PX-128M6G-2242 bugzilla-daemon
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2017-03-06 20:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2017-03-08 10:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2017-03-08 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111961
Sebastian (info@dynpages.de) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE
--- Comment #11 from Sebastian (info@dynpages.de) ---
Hi,
I can't as I replaced the SSD in the meantime, therefore I mark this issue as
obsolete. Thank you anyways for looking into this.
best regards
Sebastian
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread