From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 15579] New: ext4 -o discard produces incorrect blocks of zeroes in newly created files under heavy read+truncate+append-new-file load
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:51:38 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-15579-13602@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15579
Summary: ext4 -o discard produces incorrect blocks of zeroes in
newly created files under heavy
read+truncate+append-new-file load
Product: File System
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.33
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: ext4
AssignedTo: fs_ext4@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
ReportedBy: kernel-bugs@abeckmann.de
Regression: No
I'm testing ext4 -o discard on a Super Talent FTM56GX25H SSD. The speed
increase by using the discard option seems promising.
But I'm experiencing problems under a certain stressful file system load:
(approximate description, the actual sizes/numbers are not exact MB/GB, but
that shouldn't be a problem)
* you have a 252 GB ext4 -m 0 -T largefile filesystem
* you have 250 input files of size 1 GB each and an empty output file
* while the input has not been consumed
- load 1 MB from the end of each input file
- truncate the input files to reduce their size by 1 MB
- do some computation ...
- append 250 MB to the output file
Checking the output file after operation has finished I find blocks of 0x00
that should not be there. These blocks are usually the size of 1MB (the size
that was truncated and 'discarded') and always multiples of 16KB (the minimal
discard/TRIM-able unit (also the discard/TRIM alignment) of the SSD, found by
doing manual experiments using hdparm --trim-sector-ranges).
In several repetitions I've counted about 10-12MB of invalid 0x00 bytes in the
output.
The problem does not occur if I use 250000 inputfiles instead, read a subset of
250 files and delete them before writing the output. This is significantly
slower.
A possible cause could be some race condition between
* freeing filesystem blocks by truncating a file and queuing them for
DISCARD/TRIM
* allocating free filesystem blocks for a new append/write to a file
* submitting the DISCARD/TRIM request to the disk
* submitting the write request to the disk
Is there a possibility to generate debug information from ext4 that would be
helpful for tracking down this problem? The file system on the SSD is the only
ext[2-4] file system in the machine.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
next reply other threads:[~2010-03-19 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-19 10:51 bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2010-03-19 12:41 ` [Bug 15579] ext4 -o discard produces incorrect blocks of zeroes in newly created files under heavy read+truncate+append-new-file load bugzilla-daemon
2010-03-19 18:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-15579-13602@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).