From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 194689] New: tune2fs: bugs in handling resize inode/undo file
handling
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 07:15:42 +0000
Message-ID:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
To: linux-ext4@kernel.org
Return-path:
Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org ([198.145.29.98]:58962 "EHLO
mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751005AbdBXHPp (ORCPT
);
Fri, 24 Feb 2017 02:15:45 -0500
Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DC128756
for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 07:15:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (unknown [172.30.200.120])
by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD22728792
for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 07:15:42 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194689
Bug ID: 194689
Summary: tune2fs: bugs in handling resize inode/undo file
handling
Product: File System
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.37
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: ext4
Assignee: fs_ext4@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
Reporter: admin@tho-otto.de
Regression: No
There seem to be some bugs in handling the combination of resizing inodes and
specifying an undo file with the -z option. Before each run, i have created a
test image with the command:
$ mke2fs -F -o Linux -I 128 test.img 512
mke2fs 1.43.5-WIP (17-Feb-2017)
test.img contains a ext2 file system
created on Fri Feb 24 07:54:45 2017
Creating filesystem with 512 1k blocks and 64 inodes
Allocating group tables: done
Writing inode tables: done
Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done
Then, when running
$ E2FSPROGS_UNDO_DIR=. tune2fs -f -I 256 -z my.e2undo test.img
I get the following output
tune2fs 1.43.5-WIP (17-Feb-2017)
Resizing inodes could take some time.
Proceed anyway (or wait 5 seconds) ? (y,N)
Overwriting existing filesystem; this can be undone using the command:
e2undo ./tune2fs-test.img.e2undo test.img
Resizing inodes could take some time.
Proceed anyway (or wait 5 seconds) ? (y,N) n
./tune2fs-test.img.e2undo: while force-closing undo file
It asked two times. I let the first question timeout, but the second time it
waited forever. Also, the last line looks a bit confusing, apparently it got an
error but does not tell which one.
Next, i tried
$ E2FSPROGS_UNDO_DIR=/nonexisting tune2fs -f -I 256 -z my.e2undo test.img
tune2fs 1.43.5-WIP (17-Feb-2017)
Resizing inodes could take some time.
Proceed anyway (or wait 5 seconds) ? (y,N) y
Setting inode size 256
i.e. it happily proceeded without ever creating an undo file.
And last, when i run
$ E2FSPROGS_UNDO_DIR=. tune2fs -f -I 256 -z my.e2undo test.img
I get
tune2fs 1.43.5-WIP (17-Feb-2017)
Resizing inodes could take some time.
Proceed anyway (or wait 5 seconds) ? (y,N) y
Overwriting existing filesystem; this can be undone using the command:
e2undo ./tune2fs-test.img.e2undo test.img
Resizing inodes could take some time.
Proceed anyway (or wait 5 seconds) ? (y,N) y
Setting inode size 256
It created an undo file, but this is the default, ignoring the commandline
option.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.