From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E7AC6FA82 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 18:11:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232289AbiI0SLH (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 14:11:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45510 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232016AbiI0SLE (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 14:11:04 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD23176453 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:11:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B95FB81CF8 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 18:11:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E9EEC433D7 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 18:10:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1664302259; bh=b3Aiz2ei9nZkCqiWK7gbnijVzeuyf92sD3kFV8TF2o4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ubSh85BSG7MPARSdbLrUQVneETSFYlA5Rg0jcw+FWdWyntfEny+UfUphSP3Iedp8P 2bfHGTAszJGZWkQOEUosDoo7h8V3IkIyN2fiKYimGDBmh9GrHiHpG/0lrb7oIlghMx jPZ6kBT3QoBqe/s/negJW6lrDGsH/dBvGwJ8bYAcV0BMBgc4vGAA5rNdFJ9snVIqd6 7/lQhSPdv3D59iDxG3kgKaFbhDaVftTXTPQb+kQkMbMWS77MWmrBo9G6MGhQ2Yr6bp cbhuVJjCLbmsWHdzJPzgQ10MyFYSFDau1s4SJA1nbPMg5oMc9SCwRX6Hl2/jWr1hJd LpvV5D1f9lwsA== Received: by aws-us-west-2-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0F093C433E9; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 18:10:59 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 216529] [fstests generic/048] BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0x00000069, filemap_release_folio+0x88/0xb0 Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 18:10:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo fs_ext4@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: File System X-Bugzilla-Component: ext4 X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ritesh.list@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs_ext4@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216529 --- Comment #4 from ritesh.list@gmail.com --- On 22/09/26 01:02AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 11:55:29AM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org wrot= e: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216529 > > > > > > Hit a panic on ppc64le, by running generic/048 with 1k block size: > > Hmm, does this reproduce reliably for you? I test with a 1k block > size on x86_64 as a proxy 4k block sizes on PPC64, where the blocksize > < pagesize... and this isn't reproducing for me on x86, and I don't > have access to a PPC64LE system. > > Ritesh, is this something you can take a look at it? Thanks! I was away for some personal work for last few days, but I am back to work = from today. Sure, I will take a look at this and will get back. I did give this test a couple of runs though, but wasn't able to reproduce = it. But let me try few more things along with more iterations. Will update accordingly. -ritesh --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=