From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 219254] New: Missing memory barrier in __ext4_remount for checking ext4_forced_shutdown
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 18:05:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-219254-13602@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219254
Bug ID: 219254
Summary: Missing memory barrier in __ext4_remount for checking
ext4_forced_shutdown
Product: File System
Version: 2.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ext4
Assignee: fs_ext4@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
Reporter: fanqi.yu@columbia.edu
Regression: No
Hi,
In other places of the kernel, accesses to SB_RDONLY and EXT4_FLAGS_SHUTDOWN
are ordered by smp_wmb() for writes and smp_rmb() for reads:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=4418e14112e3ca85e8492a4489a3552b0cc526a8
There seems to be a missing smp_rmb() here between sb_rdonly(sb) and
ext4_forced_shutdown(sb):
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/fs/ext4/super.c?h=v6.11-rc7#n6506
The affected scenario:
Normally a remount-ro-after-error file system would not be able to be remounted
as rw again because the ext4_forced_shutdown(sb) check will return -EROFS. On a
relaxed memory architecture, it is possible to see ext4_forced_shutdown(sb) as
false despite sb_rdonly(sb) being true (i.e. the write to EXT4_FLAGS_SHUTDOWN
not being propagated in time to the reader). __ext4_remount therefore misses
the shutdown check and can remount the fs as rw without giving any errors.
I am not sure about the severity of this but it is probably something hard to
find otherwise so I thought it might be useful to share it here and see what
you guys think.
Thank you very much for your time!
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
reply other threads:[~2024-09-09 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-219254-13602@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox