* [Bug 40822] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1044: inode #3308277: comm rm: deleted inode referenced: 3058008
2011-08-10 8:57 [Bug 40822] New: EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1044: inode #3308277: comm rm: deleted inode referenced: 3058008 bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-01-20 20:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-21 2:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-01-20 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40822
--- Comment #1 from Sebastien Koechlin <seb.kernel@koocotte.org> 2013-01-20 20:32:01 ---
I have again the exact same problem using kernel 3.7.1
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug 40822] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1044: inode #3308277: comm rm: deleted inode referenced: 3058008
2011-08-10 8:57 [Bug 40822] New: EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1044: inode #3308277: comm rm: deleted inode referenced: 3058008 bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-20 20:32 ` [Bug 40822] " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-01-21 2:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-06 7:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-01-21 2:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40822
Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tytso@mit.edu
--- Comment #2 from Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> 2013-01-21 02:01:26 ---
The file system corruption reported by e2fsck is consistent with the complaint
from the kernel. Specifically, there is an entry in the directory which is
pointing at a deleted inode.
What's not clear is whether this file system corruption is caused by a kernel
bug, or a hardware error (bit flip by the hard drive or the memory), or
something else.
What did you mean by this?
No stack trace (btw I had one two hours before the first EXT4-fs warning
related to RX buffer, see #13561)
What do you mean by see "#13561"?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug 40822] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1044: inode #3308277: comm rm: deleted inode referenced: 3058008
2011-08-10 8:57 [Bug 40822] New: EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1044: inode #3308277: comm rm: deleted inode referenced: 3058008 bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-20 20:32 ` [Bug 40822] " bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-21 2:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-09-06 7:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-23 14:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-09-06 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40822
Catalin(ux) M. BOIE <fedora@embedromix.ro> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fedora@embedromix.ro
--- Comment #3 from Catalin(ux) M. BOIE <fedora@embedromix.ro> ---
I am getting the same error.
I was running a Fedora 19 guest inside a Fedora 19 host.
At some moment, I had 0 free space on the partition were qcow2 guest image was.
qemu paused the machine I did press resume several times.
I made space and some time after I got this error.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug 40822] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1044: inode #3308277: comm rm: deleted inode referenced: 3058008
2011-08-10 8:57 [Bug 40822] New: EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1044: inode #3308277: comm rm: deleted inode referenced: 3058008 bugzilla-daemon
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-09-06 7:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-23 14:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-03-25 10:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-23 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40822
Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Kernel Version|2.6.39.3 |3.7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug 40822] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1044: inode #3308277: comm rm: deleted inode referenced: 3058008
2011-08-10 8:57 [Bug 40822] New: EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1044: inode #3308277: comm rm: deleted inode referenced: 3058008 bugzilla-daemon
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-12-23 14:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-03-25 10:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-11 9:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-03-25 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40822
Sebastien Koechlin <seb.kernel@koocotte.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |seb.kernel@koocotte.org
--- Comment #4 from Sebastien Koechlin <seb.kernel@koocotte.org> ---
Sorry, I did not see that I had an answer on bugzilla. I will monitor it from
now.
Here is the situation:
- The problem came back every few month during this time. I run many fsck, it
usually correct things, but maybe not this particular deleted inode problem
(fsck bug?).
- I updated on 2014-02-10 to kernel 3.13.2 and e2fsck.static to 1.42.9-3
(e2fsck-static_1.42.9-2_i386.deb), and the problem happened today.
- About hardware error: this server is running continuously since this initial
bug report without problem (no other filesystem corrupted, no segfaults, no
kernel ooops...)
- About Host: Debian Linux 32bits, kernel is 64bits, RAID1+LVM2, many-many
hardlinks (an inode has 29542 links), filesystem resized (to grow it) may
times. It's always between 85 and 95% full.
I have in dmesg:
[3654666.866636] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1437: inode #300243:
comm rsync: deleted inode referenced: 2748375
[3654666.911302] Aborting journal on device dm-4-8.
[3654666.970296] EXT4-fs (dm-4): Remounting filesystem read-only
[3654667.104392] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1437: inode #300243:
comm rsync: deleted inode referenced: 2748375
Previous was using kernel 3.12.6:
[ 3226.048137] EXT4-fs (dm-4): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts:
errors=remount-ro,user_xattr
[ 3526.870020] EXT4-fs (dm-4): error count: 21
[ 3526.870108] EXT4-fs (dm-4): initial error at 1372893876: ext4_lookup:1428:
inode 915940
[ 3526.870271] EXT4-fs (dm-4): last error at 1372930167: ext4_put_super:762:
inode 1676891
e2fsck just recover the journal and with -f does not find anything wrong.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug 40822] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1044: inode #3308277: comm rm: deleted inode referenced: 3058008
2011-08-10 8:57 [Bug 40822] New: EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1044: inode #3308277: comm rm: deleted inode referenced: 3058008 bugzilla-daemon
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-03-25 10:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-04-11 9:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-11 12:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-06-05 14:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-11 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40822
--- Comment #5 from Sebastien Koechlin <seb.kernel@koocotte.org> ---
It just happened again this night with same vanilia 3.13.2
[5119710.472436] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1437: inode #2152907:
comm rsync: deleted inode referenced: 2707130
[5119710.522811] Aborting journal on device dm-4-8.
[5119710.574721] EXT4-fs (dm-4): Remounting filesystem read-only
[5119710.574919] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1437: inode #539523:
comm rsync: deleted inode referenced: 2707130
[5119710.575622] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1437: inode #2368102:
comm rsync: deleted inode referenced: 2707130
[5119710.576139] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1437: inode #2466174:
comm rsync: deleted inode referenced: 2707130
[5119710.576593] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1437: inode #2563212:
comm rsync: deleted inode referenced: 2707130
[5119710.577058] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1437: inode #2608359:
comm rsync: deleted inode referenced: 2707130
[5119710.577537] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1437: inode #2459036:
comm rsync: deleted inode referenced: 2707130
[5119710.577986] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1437: inode #507856:
comm rsync: deleted inode referenced: 2707130
[5119710.578412] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1437: inode #461587:
comm rsync: deleted inode referenced: 2707130
[5119710.578859] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1437: inode #506061:
comm rsync: deleted inode referenced: 2707130
umount, dume2fs says Filesystem state: clean with errors
I had to run fsck (1.42.9) twice:
barberine:/# e2fsck.static -f /dev/vg_main/lv_lagerbe
e2fsck 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)
/dev/vg_main/lv_lagerbe: recovering journal
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
Free blocks count wrong (8520386, counted=6873111).
Fix<y>? yes
Free inodes count wrong (1313708, counted=800557).
Fix<y>? yes
/dev/vg_main/lv_lagerbe: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
/dev/vg_main/lv_lagerbe: 4212947/5013504 files (0.4% non-contiguous),
60235753/67108864 blocks
barberine:/# e2fsck.static -f /dev/vg_main/lv_lagerbe
e2fsck 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Invalid inode number for '.' in directory inode 2022770.
Fix<y>? yes
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
'..' in
/2012-02-01/home/xxxx/.gconf/desktop/gnome/peripherals/keyboard/host-ramoth/0
(2022770) is
/2012-02-01/home/xxxx/.gconf/desktop/gnome/peripherals/keyboard/host-ramothold
(2022765), should be
/2012-02-01/home/xxxx/.gconf/desktop/gnome/peripherals/keyboard/host-ramoth
(2022764).
Fix<y>? yes
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Inode 2022764 ref count is 4, should be 3. Fix<y>? yes
Inode 2022765 ref count is 2, should be 3. Fix<y>? yes
Inode 2238203 ref count is 26, should be 25. Fix<y>? yes
Inode 4195764 ref count is 23, should be 24. Fix<y>? yes
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
/dev/vg_main/lv_lagerbe: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
/dev/vg_main/lv_lagerbe: 4212947/5013504 files (0.4% non-contiguous),
60235753/67108864 blocks
barberine:/space/gbu# e2fsck.static -f /dev/vg_main/lv_lagerbe
e2fsck 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
/dev/vg_main/lv_lagerbe: 4212947/5013504 files (0.4% non-contiguous),
60235753/67108864 blocks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug 40822] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1044: inode #3308277: comm rm: deleted inode referenced: 3058008
2011-08-10 8:57 [Bug 40822] New: EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1044: inode #3308277: comm rm: deleted inode referenced: 3058008 bugzilla-daemon
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-11 9:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-04-11 12:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-06-05 14:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-11 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40822
--- Comment #6 from Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> ---
The fact that the first fsck had just summary accounting errors in pass 1, and
then a subsequent, back-to-back fsck showed errors in pass2, screams either (a)
some kind of hardware error, (b) the two mirrored copies of the RAID1 are out
of sync, or (c) someone or something else was modifying the filesytem at the
same time (i.e., the file system was mounted, and for some reason e2fsck's
safety checks didn't trigger, or it some other fsck or userspace program was
running at the same time, etc.)
I'm going to guess that (b) is the most likely, since this is a local
filesystem (i.e., you're not using fibre channel, or a remote block device, or
a dual-hosted SCSI arrangement or anything else exotic). Could you try to
force a resync of the RAID mirrors, and then run another e2fsck -f check?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug 40822] EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1044: inode #3308277: comm rm: deleted inode referenced: 3058008
2011-08-10 8:57 [Bug 40822] New: EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_lookup:1044: inode #3308277: comm rm: deleted inode referenced: 3058008 bugzilla-daemon
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-11 12:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-06-05 14:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-06-05 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40822
Sebastien Koechlin <seb.kernel@koocotte.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #7 from Sebastien Koechlin <seb.kernel@koocotte.org> ---
It's a Debian system, it's performing an array-check every month (by echoing
check into relevant /sys/block/$array/md/sync_action) and I have never seen any
error in dmesg.
But I found a strange drive, its SMART attributes were not updated for more
than 6 month (Power_On_Hours in particular).
I changed this drive and I can not reproduce any error. You've probably guessed
right; so I close this bug.
Thanks a lot.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread