From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 71641] Unreasonable performance degradation in ext4 with full data journaling
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:40:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-71641-13602-LfCF31tFUe@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-71641-13602@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71641
--- Comment #8 from Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> ---
it's clear this isn't going to get performance up to 1.1 GB/s, but I'm curious
how much setting JBD2_NR_BATCH changes things at 512 and 1024 and possibly even
2048. Once it no longer maters a difference, if you could do another
blktrace, and also gather lock_stat information, that would be useful.
To gather lock_stat information, enable CONFIG_LOCK_STAT, and then "echo 0 >
/proc/lock_stat" before you start the workload, and then capture the output of
/proc/lock_stat after you finish running your workload/benchmark.
If you also regather numbers with lock_stat enabled on a stock 3.11 kernel (and
also get a /proc/lock_stat report from a stock 3.11 kernel, with and without
data=journal), that would be useful.
If it turns out that there is some lock contention going on with some of the
jbd2 spinlocks, there are some patches queued for 3.15 that I may have to ask
you to try (which will mean going to something like 3.14-rc7 plus some
additional patches from the ext4 git tree).
Thanks for your benchmarking!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-26 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-07 11:39 [Bug 71641] New: Unreasonable performance degradation in ext4 with full data journaling bugzilla-daemon
2014-03-07 16:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-03-07 16:20 ` [Bug 71641] " bugzilla-daemon
2014-03-07 17:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-03-19 9:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-03-20 4:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-03-20 12:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-03-21 8:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-03-21 8:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-03-21 8:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-03-21 8:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-03-21 16:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-03-26 10:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-03-26 13:40 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2014-03-28 10:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-03-28 10:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-71641-13602-LfCF31tFUe@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).