public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	<jack@suse.cz>, <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <jun.nie@linaro.org>,
	<ebiggers@kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
	<yangerkun@huawei.com>, <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
	<syzbot+a158d886ca08a3fecca4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	<stable@vger.kernel.org>, Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: fix race condition between buffer write and page_mkwrite
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 10:17:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c20befb7-cd2e-019a-57d4-35da70e0f534@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230604030445.GF1128744@mit.edu>

On 2023/6/4 11:04, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> I tried testing to see if this fixed [1], and it appears to be
> triggering a lockdep warning[2] at this line in the patch:
>
> [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4582777a19ec422b517
> [2] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=17260843280000
>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
>> index d101b3b0c7da..9df82d72eb90 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
>> @@ -808,6 +809,27 @@ static int ext4_file_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>>   	if (!daxdev_mapping_supported(vma, dax_dev))
>>   		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>   
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Writing via mmap has no logic to handle inline data, so we
>> +	 * need to call ext4_convert_inline_data() to convert the inode
>> +	 * to normal format before doing so, otherwise a BUG_ON will be
>> +	 * triggered in ext4_writepages() due to the
>> +	 * EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA flag. Moreover, we need to grab
>> +	 * i_rwsem during conversion, since clearing and setting the
>> +	 * inline data flag may race with ext4_buffered_write_iter()
>> +	 * to trigger a BUG_ON.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (ext4_has_feature_inline_data(sb) &&
>> +	    vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED && vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYWRITE) {
>> +		int err;
>> +
>> +		inode_lock(inode); <=================== LOCKDEP warning
>> +		err = ext4_convert_inline_data(inode);
>> +		inode_unlock(inode);
>> +		if (err)
>> +			return err;
>> +	}
>
> The details of the lockdep warning from [2], which appears to be a
> mmap(2) racing with a buffered write(2) are below.  Could you take a
> look?
>
> Thanks!
>
> 					- Ted

Sorry for the late reply!

Had a look at this question which is similar to the one Honza mentioned 
earlier.
Concurrency between write and mmap as follows can lead to ABBA deadlocks:

     CPU0                   CPU1
   write(2)                mmap(2)
ext4_file_write_iter
  ext4_buffered_write_iter
   inode_lock(inode)  ---> LOCK A
   generic_perform_write
                          ksys_mmap_pgoff
                           vm_mmap_pgoff
                            mmap_write_lock_killable(mm) ---> LOCK B
                            do_mmap
                             mmap_region
                              call_mmap
                               ext4_file_mmap
                                inode_lock(inode)  ---> try LOCK A again
    fault_in_iov_iter_readable              |
     fault_in_readable                      |
      asm_exc_page_fault                ABBA deadlock
       handle_page_fault                    |
        do_user_addr_fault                  |
         mmap_read_lock(mm) ---> try LOCK B again


Thanks!
-- 
With Best Regards,
Baokun Li
.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-05  2:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-30 13:44 [PATCH v2] ext4: fix race condition between buffer write and page_mkwrite Baokun Li
2023-05-31 13:15 ` Jan Kara
2023-06-04  3:04 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-06-04 21:08   ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-06-05  1:58     ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-06-05  9:16       ` Jan Kara
2023-06-05 12:21         ` Jan Kara
2023-06-05 14:55           ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-06-05 15:08             ` Jan Kara
2023-06-06 12:19               ` Baokun Li
2024-04-15  4:28               ` Baokun Li
2024-04-15 12:34                 ` Jan Kara
2024-04-15 14:07                   ` Baokun Li
2023-06-05  2:17   ` Baokun Li [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c20befb7-cd2e-019a-57d4-35da70e0f534@huawei.com \
    --to=libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jun.nie@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+a158d886ca08a3fecca4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox