From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Weinberger Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: fscrypt: update mailing list, patchwork, and git Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 21:12:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20170426234300.54741-1-ebiggers3@gmail.com> <20170427174557.GB8130@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Y . Ts'o" , Eric Biggers , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , linux-fsdevel , Jaegeuk Kim , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Biggers Return-path: Received: from b.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.144]:44723 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756314AbdD0TMp (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2017 15:12:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170427174557.GB8130@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Eric, Am 27.04.2017 um 19:45 schrieb Eric Biggers: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 09:37:18AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> +FSCRYPT: FILE SYSTEM LEVEL ENCRYPTION SUPPORT >>> M: Theodore Y. Ts'o >>> M: Jaegeuk Kim >> >> IMHO we should also add such an entry, to match reality: >> >> R: Eric Biggers >> > > Well, we could, but IMO it's a little pointless since there's now a dedicated > mailing list, so there's no need to Cc me separately from the list. I think > explicitly listing reviewer(s) is more useful for subsystems that don't have a > dedicated mailing list. It depends on your workflow. i.e. my mail filters give mails that go directly to me a much higher priority. Thanks, //richard