From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABE4C433F5 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 06:11:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241398AbiAYGK4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 01:10:56 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:53386 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238580AbiAYGCb (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 01:02:31 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 20P5km0G006273; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 06:02:13 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=lCToaLxbJRfZkhhxLYTey5wBBBigPwYEHa3c6ZYVMDw=; b=hfhehMiWjPw2QJn95hAlEXBxWqelvmqNpVlvj0NXsiWAyAe2jn3ixwuUj94Gyug483Hv QrZ8FvXgKARYm5fkc4eNsvVMqSLsvPLxXa7qa3Ktlzk2/UkDRfNZTaiZJTCIvpX86T6R ZDQfhIY0t3VW9AJyMTX549/sx7W54S6dSOA+YqbxCyK5Dd+8N4LDHhdo8J2jDhnT/Q9I Nqd78z7IY7WT73W6CDuxfLoCPD+ubQvjgqvEmbpqzpXfNMkT7UJSWcJcAt660VDJj+cp Sd2vpAi0fvV3NqCOvy412Z2MZQYDD51GRrohbOfpNIXlyZ3lfgXeA/mdSfamkMsUguI6 cQ== Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3dtbc0g91q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 06:02:12 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 20P5xIt9030603; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 06:02:10 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3dr96j9h1w-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 06:02:10 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 20P6281e41615870 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 06:02:08 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086994C044; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 06:02:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3CF4C052; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 06:02:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [9.43.18.116]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 06:02:07 +0000 (GMT) From: Ritesh Harjani To: fstests , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: Zhang Yi , tytso@mit.edu, Jan Kara , chenlong , Ritesh Harjani Subject: [RFC 0/1] ext4/054: Should we remove auto and quick group? Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 11:32:01 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: oJuTaWRAlKvEh3S4roz2tQMXk4yTpitq X-Proofpoint-GUID: oJuTaWRAlKvEh3S4roz2tQMXk4yTpitq Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-01-25_01,2022-01-24_02,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1011 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=706 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2201250040 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Hello Zhang/Ted, Looks like the issue fixed by patches at [1], were observed with fault injection testing and with errors=continue mount option. But were not cc'd to stable. Do you think those should be cc'd to stable tree? Meanwhile, I was thinking we should anyway remove auto and quick group from this test as it could trigger a bug on in older kernel targets. Thoughts? [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210908120850.4012324-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com/ Ritesh Harjani (1): ext4/054: Remove auto and quick group tests/ext4/054 | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.31.1