From: Evgeniy Ivanov <lolkaantimat@gmail.com>
To: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext2/ext3 different block_sizes/i_size/e2fsck question
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:43:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1e08eb01003251543r8ea9b34v3837da8f158d3df6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100325015503.GJ2159@thunk.org>
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:55 AM, <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:27:24PM +0300, Evgeniy Ivanov wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for bothering list with my ext2 questions.
>> I got into trouble with my ext2 implementation and filesystem with
>> 1024 block size. Sometimes when I write files they're written
>> correctly (md5sum is the same as original, i_size is correct either),
>> but e2fsck changes i_size to another values (which breaks files). E.g.
>> 67445000->67446784 or 67445248->67446784. I see that new sizes are
>> numbers of multiples of 1024.
>> Strange thing is that I can't reproduce this problem with 2048 and
>> 4096 block sizes. I thought the problem was in trash in unused part of
>> last block (actually it is zeroed), but then it would be reproduceable
>> in fs with another block size.
>
> E2fsck will adjust i_size if it is smaller than the number of blocks
> than you have allocated. So in the case of 67445000->67446784, your
> file probably had 65866 1k blocks, and since 67445000 is less than
> (655865*1024)+1, e2fsck assumed that your i_size was wrong, and so it
> asked for permission to fix it.
>
> Put another way, if you have 2 blocks in 1k file, and i_size is 1024,
> it clearly must be wrong. If it's 1025, maybe we're only using 1 byte
> in the last block; but if i_size is less than or equal to 1024, then
> why was the 2nd block allocated in the file in the first place?
Thank you for your explanation.
My problem was in miscalculation of first triple indirect block. I
used following thing "triple_ind_s = doub_ind_s + pow(addr_in_block,
2)" and it was a bad idea to use pow() instead of multiplication or
shifting. It was ok with gcc (and libc), but caused a problem with ACK
(I get value of 1 less, thus each last double indirect block became a
hole instead of data). Since that was both in reading and writing md5
sums were correct (and in Linux I checked them only after e2fsck).
Funny bug :)
--
Evgeniy Ivanov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-25 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-24 19:27 ext2/ext3 different block_sizes/i_size/e2fsck question Evgeniy Ivanov
2010-03-24 23:18 ` Evgeniy Ivanov
2010-03-25 1:55 ` tytso
2010-03-25 22:43 ` Evgeniy Ivanov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e1e08eb01003251543r8ea9b34v3837da8f158d3df6@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lolkaantimat@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).