From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from canpmsgout05.his.huawei.com (canpmsgout05.his.huawei.com [113.46.200.220]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD7AB24DD17; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 01:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.220 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763690365; cv=none; b=tQ/p/15SmbKc0HnFnpBGWKEMK6Lp8bTuigQpultDgXS2wFeY59n6Fqk/Z5nCwBgQAabNcGJBWzdCiJ03r6L3AIAnEwGhdUNjO5BawdLrg5CE3NSXWsn6ZHXyFdztbhaO3OalIe+rKYpRkzLvLf7eF6b1k9BItXVsf8SlwLiKquk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763690365; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GIp0009+sUVrkjvzUUTzbgJHB8S8wPYfh9xGIoGtLHY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=aIULNBGyrS348q1HMZfvsZMd7IHN1FZBWOmKlIU3lnQxGCgR7qCuJktQDa2Ljd3l3eaL3UHXbBmPt8wwMK67ntys2yvpr6BPvsON5DbjXnHnO4QOQ7vcRlHLvmIPZLa6e2EFJqWZkUP0ONpFuQYm36RPd9cZrctZ2bp2VtdHOts= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b=oO7FkeeE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.220 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b="oO7FkeeE" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=huawei.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=8IxzA0xrDRDuCux7I/75OlQIhFWCZrW9huNpmM6c2T4=; b=oO7FkeeEM51Lb0MdKyJBUbM6TX/LcMbaZV5EhyhjfHqfclk+U4zfapIHF0azYgBWx4ArKTKFx t1YMU4B8OtTLHcwOMOGbTPmPOiUaxsDtrg1EantBTQm5YrxNot4nuuWzXt+yXisLgrQyNykC0+Z YNOxmRW6pQM+62Tv2PpG1v0= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.162.254]) by canpmsgout05.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4dCJJf6xhjz12Lhq; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 09:57:54 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemf500013.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.188]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0BBB18048B; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 09:59:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.174.178.254) by dggpemf500013.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.188) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 09:59:20 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 09:59:18 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 21/24] ext4: make data=journal support large block size Content-Language: en-GB To: Theodore Tso CC: Dan Carpenter , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Baokun Li References: <202511161433.qI6uGU0m-lkp@intel.com> <20251120154104.GA13687@macsyma-3.local> From: Baokun Li In-Reply-To: <20251120154104.GA13687@macsyma-3.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems200002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.68) To dggpemf500013.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.188) On 2025-11-20 23:41, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 09:21:23AM +0800, Baokun Li wrote: >> Oops! You nailed it. My bad, I totally forgot that unlock here, which >> definitely left the lock unbalanced. I'll get that fixed up in v3. > I think you meant v4 (since the current patch series are v3 :-). Haha, yes, , I messed up the version number. 😅 > When > do you think you might be able to get the next version of this patch > series ready? I think we're almost ready to land this feature! > > - Ted > Yep, the current tests look clean! Good news on the dependencies too: [1] and [2] are already merged to next. [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=ee040cbd6e48 [2]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=50b2a4f19b22 I'll be sending out v4 today to fix the issue Dan mentioned, and then I think this feature is ready to land!  [P.S.: I noticed Christoph Hellwig and Eric Biggers are cleaning up the  fscrypt API. That might clear the way for us to ditch the "no fscrypt  support for ext4 LBS" restriction later on. I'm also looking into  speeding up large block checksums. But I think these extra features and  improvements can evolve independently from the work we’re doing now.] Cheers, Baokun