public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "wangjianjian (C)" <wangjianjian3@huawei.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: <tytso@mit.edu>, <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	<wangjianjian0@foxmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4,fiemap: Add inode offset for xattr fiemap
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 09:05:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcc21a8b-4c53-4755-9747-8e6b83036ecd@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251217163521.GO94594@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On 2025/12/18 0:35, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 04:47:08PM +0800, Wang Jianjian wrote:
>> For xattr in inode, need add inode offset in this block?
>> Also, there is one problem, if we have xattrs both in inode
>> and block, current implementation will only return xattr inode fiemap.
>> Is this by design?
> 
> I don't think there's much value in reporting the inline xattrs via
> FIEMAP because user programs can't directly access that area anyway.
> The only reason (AFAICT) for reporting the external xattr block is for
> building a map of lost data given a report of localized media failure.
yes, I agree with this. however, current behavior is it will always 
reporting inline xattr first. Do you think we should fix this?
> 
> (FIEMAP only being useful for debugging and after-the-shatter forensics)
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Jianjian <wangjianjian3@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/ext4/extents.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
>> index 2cf5759ba689..a16bfc75345d 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
>> @@ -5043,6 +5043,7 @@ static int ext4_iomap_xattr_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct iomap *iomap)
>>   		if (error)
>>   			return error;
>>   		physical = (__u64)iloc.bh->b_blocknr << blockbits;
>> +		physical += iloc.offset;
> 
> Also it doesn't make sense to add the address of the external block to
> the inode offset.
IIUC, bh is the buffer head of the inode is in and iloc.offset is its 
offset of this block.
> 
> --D
> 
>>   		offset = EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE +
>>   				EXT4_I(inode)->i_extra_isize;
>>   		physical += offset;
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>
>>
-- 
Regards


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-18  1:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-17  8:47 [PATCH] ext4,fiemap: Add inode offset for xattr fiemap Wang Jianjian
2025-12-17 16:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-18  1:05   ` wangjianjian (C) [this message]
2025-12-18 23:36     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-19  0:50       ` wangjianjian (C)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fcc21a8b-4c53-4755-9747-8e6b83036ecd@huawei.com \
    --to=wangjianjian3@huawei.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=wangjianjian0@foxmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox