From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from canpmsgout07.his.huawei.com (canpmsgout07.his.huawei.com [113.46.200.222]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBA3ADF72; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 01:20:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.222 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762910439; cv=none; b=feeTjAx2k7lKxsBGL8P97Kbiz0fO+bfvZ71grjoYQB2wHFM9cecjojzbklwRtFbsqroU+2ARnhXmsmlZyJF+ljnYkQ+mXCDiqDPW1YgYICUIgwlfP496Lha4rBJ95L/CgMeSZ/tQ+I7cfghKbuRcUBX01KwRMkssZaDi1u3cZWc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762910439; c=relaxed/simple; bh=i/kJ9FzcUzzJbN+8egCrW+P9oVxUgXOunl/yOHbhvEY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=LihjbfnMCUrCr2+jNEXf1U0zWaXB/Yv2qm6rRGZtHkuc200AnU1ooi//6rk66yLGxdXkSAUBXk29HgNFqH0QH+HjSKD4dYvH7BteSHE6E1iPFsHxauYF4tFIjxVrGU79nKhBLJ+J3wg6MoJjPVJVrnyTwVg2x2bcc3iNjSJFc0k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b=rsb8QHDT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.222 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b="rsb8QHDT" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=huawei.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=3foWcY4mqyY24vhktD3T8660J0H3J/4ohG+XUqORjVo=; b=rsb8QHDT2jx28W2WOoLFAoV2bBM1NPZ5i6SXuE890zAiKLcvonBIHfgjKWS1gr6L3zxaNzD5+ SW/dMAMYsAu1WWisoQHIRWXRKFHJK11M+PRV/IYpZLK9QG+P8IQ3TU4I6XyF8Oyw7hIVEagg5ut t/Ry2AzU64cBYwezvwSkunA= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.17]) by canpmsgout07.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4d5lsn2SqrzLlrc; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:18:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemf500013.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.188]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4966F1A0188; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:20:32 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.174.178.254) by dggpemf500013.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.188) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:20:31 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:20:30 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 24/24] ext4: enable block size larger than page size Content-Language: en-GB To: Theodore Ts'o , Pankaj Raghav CC: , , , , , , , , , , , Baokun Li References: <20251111142634.3301616-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com> <20251111142634.3301616-25-libaokun@huaweicloud.com> <880280be-1cd0-41b6-bc89-9168f374a9b9@pankajraghav.com> <20251111211148.GL2988753@mit.edu> From: Baokun Li In-Reply-To: <20251111211148.GL2988753@mit.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems200001.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.67) To dggpemf500013.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.188) On 2025-11-12 05:11, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 07:01:20PM +0100, Pankaj Raghav wrote: >> If you are planning to send another revision, then it would be nice to include >> the corresponding patch to mke2fs as well? I don't know how ext4 process works but >> just a suggestion. > It's actually more convenient for me not to mix userspace and kernel > patches, because b4 doesn't know the difference. For that matter > replying with an unrelated patch can also confuse b4, so it's a bit > easier for people using b4 to send unrelated patches as a separate > mail thread, using git format-patch / git send-email. > > In this case, the corresponding patch to mke2fs is pretty simple, and > I've already pushed it to the e2fsprogs git repo: > > https://github.com/tytso/e2fsprogs/commit/6d9033ff854eb346746176f43aa063137275d4b1 > > :-) > > Cheers, > > - Ted Thank you for the adaptation in mke2fs! Cheers, Baokun