Re: Filesystem still has errors

Raimund Andersen
2009-02-11T22:34:53Z

Eric Sandeen <sandeen <at> redhat.com> writes:

>
> You should expect that checking a live filesystem will produce errors,
> actually. So don't worry about that. The filesystem is not quiesced,
> and it's not consistent. That is to be expected, and it's why you see
> the different behavior w/ forcefsck vs. e2fsck -n on the live fs.
>
> As for the spurious ENOSPC, I'm not certain. Do you still get the error?

Thanks for your quick reply. No, at the moment, I don't get it. Yesterday, it
occured once and a reboot let it vanish, and I got it some days before. Also
then, a reboot let it disappear. So could it be of help if I collect any
information in the case it might reappear? What exactly should I do then?

Thank you, once again.

rgds Raimund