Re: Filesystem still has errors

Eric Sandeen
2009-02-11T22:36:21Z

Raimund Andersen wrote:
> Eric Sandeen <sandeen <at> redhat.com> writes:
>
>> You should expect that checking a live filesystem will produce errors,
>> actually. So don't worry about that. The filesystem is not quiesced,
>> and it's not consistent. That is to be expected, and it's why you see
>> the different behavior w/ forcefsck vs. e2fsck -n on the live fs.
>>
>> As for the spurious ENOSPC, I'm not certain. Do you still get the error?
>
> Thanks for your quick reply. No, at the moment, I don't get it. Yesterday, it
> occured once and a reboot let it vanish, and I got it some days before. Also
> then, a reboot let it disappear. So could it be of help if I collect any
> information in the case it might reappear? What exactly should I do then?

If you can, I'd test a 2.6.29-rc4 kernel, see if the very latest code is
behaving any better...

-Eric

> Thank you, once again.
>
> rgds Raimund