From: Matthias Koenig <mkoenig@suse.de>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, hvogel@suse.de,
Girish Shilamkar <Girish.Shilamkar@Sun.COM>,
Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Integrating patches in SLES10 e2fsprogs
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:26:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <n7x1w82nf7m.fsf@sor.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080127050543.GC24842@mit.edu> (Theodore Tso's message of "Sun\, 27 Jan 2008 00\:05\:43 -0500")
Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> writes:
> Wow. You have a lot of patches in the SLES 10 e2fsprogs. I'm not
> sure why of them are there, though. For example:
>
> Patch0: elf.diff
>
> I'm not sure what this one is for.
>
> Patch1: e2fsprogs-1.35-libdir.diff
>
> This one does two different things. One is include AC_HEADER_TIME in
> configure.in, and the other is to use $lib instead of "lib" when
> defining root_libdir. This seems to force root_libdir to /, which
> makes no sense to me.
We want to have the shared libs in /lib{,64}, but the devel so links
have to remain in /usr/lib{,64}.
But looking closer at this, it seems that these patches are not needed,
since the result can be obtained by defining ELF_INSTALL_DIR.
I will drop these.
> Patch4: e2fsprogs-blkid.diff
>
> This patch causes fsck to check the BLKID_FILE environment variable
> and passes it to the blkid library. But the blkid library *already*
> checks the BLKID_FILE environtment variable already. So I'm not sure
> why this is necessary at all.
Ok, the patch is obsolete indeed.
> Patch6: e2fsprogs-mdraid.patch
>
> This apparently adds a new environment variable,
> BLKID_SKIP_CHECK_MDRAID, which forces blkid to not detect mdraid
> devices. I'm not sure why.
Workaround for people having stale RAID signature on their disk:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=100530
> Patch10: close.patch
>
> I don't understand what this patch is trying to do.
This patch is obsolete, as the issue is fixed by
git commit 0d961040fe9ad927254b5a0e1a4de7bedadd8579
The original patch posted in Novell bugzilla #132708
contained this additional hunk, which is likely obsolete:
@@ -217,6 +217,7 @@
EXT2_CHECK_MAGIC(fs, EXT2_ET_MAGIC_EXT2FS_FILSYS);
+ super_shadow = fs->super;
fs_state = fs->super->s_state;
fs->super->s_wtime = time(NULL);
> Patch12: e2fsprogs-mkinstalldirs.patch
>
> Why?
Is needed since we recreate the auto* files.
But I agree that this patch should better set
MKINSTALLDIRS = @MKDIR_P@
not to literal "mkdir -p". The @MKINSTALLDIRS@ seems to be
obsolete in newer gettext (which seems to pull this in).
> Patch22: e2fsprogs-1.40.4-uuidd_pid_path.patch
>
> The problem with this patch is that /var/run is cleared via rm -rf, so
> it is highly problamtic to put the scratch directory for uuidd in
> /var/run.
Are you really sure? My interpretation of FHS is, that files under
/var/run/ have to be cleared or truncated, but the subdirectories do not
get deleted.
> Patch34: libcom_err-compile_et_permissions.patch
>
> Why?
This is just a workaround and is not intended to stay there forever,
it is also not intended for upstream inclusion.
I have been asked to add this to avoid build problems of some other
package (I think it was kerberos). I will have to check if this is
still needed.
Thanks,
Matthias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-28 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-24 21:17 Integrating patches in SLES10 e2fsprogs Andreas Dilger
2008-01-24 21:27 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-01-25 15:22 ` Matthias Koenig
2008-01-27 5:05 ` Theodore Tso
2008-01-27 15:06 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-01-27 20:27 ` Theodore Tso
2008-01-28 4:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-01-28 5:24 ` Theodore Tso
2008-01-28 5:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-01-28 16:01 ` Thierry Vignaud
2008-01-28 16:06 ` Thierry Vignaud
2008-01-28 17:03 ` Theodore Tso
2008-01-28 17:00 ` Theodore Tso
2008-01-28 15:26 ` Matthias Koenig [this message]
2008-01-28 15:38 ` Theodore Tso
2008-01-28 16:54 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-01-28 20:59 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-01-29 13:52 ` Matthias Koenig
2008-01-29 14:35 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=n7x1w82nf7m.fsf@sor.suse.de \
--to=mkoenig@suse.de \
--cc=Girish.Shilamkar@Sun.COM \
--cc=esandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=hvogel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).