From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: xfstests failure generic/299
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:03:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nsxvc7ra2cv.fsf@closure.thunk.org> (raw)
Hi Dmitry,
I've been noticing that the relatively new test #299 (which I didn't use
in the previous development cycle) is failing for me, both for the
current ext4 dev branch, as well as v3.9-rc5-1-g8cde7ad (the
origin/branch point from Linus's tree for the dev branch).
Is this test passing for you, and is there some patch whic I'm missing
which addresses this?
Thanks,
- Ted
generic/299 [16:34:59][ 155.348963] fio (3364) used
greatest stack depth: 5280 bytes left
[ 156.195750] fio (3366) used greatest stack depth: 5184 bytes left
[ 156.243934] fio (3363) used greatest stack depth: 4960 bytes left
^[[A[ 361.330343] INFO: task umount:3426 blocked for more than 120
seconds.
[ 361.331097] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
disables this message.
[ 361.331823] f4361d90 00000046 f043a000 c16a0ac0 c16a0ac0 75e421ae
00000028 00000000
[ 361.332620] 00000000 f5ba02a0 c016c753 75e41aee 00000000 f6ad4080
75e41739 00000028
[ 361.333479] 00000001 00000000 f6ad4080 f4361da4 c020882b 00000000
f6ad4080 75e40f23
[ 361.334250] Call Trace:
[ 361.334728] [<c016c753>] ? sched_clock+0x17/0x29
[ 361.335272] [<c020882b>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x1e2/0x20e
[ 361.335781] [<c0f5a34e>] schedule+0xe3/0xf4
[ 361.336182] [<c0f57361>] schedule_timeout+0x28/0x12b
[ 361.336681] [<c023ce71>] ? mark_held_locks+0xc1/0xff
[ 361.337156] [<c0f5d16d>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x5f/0xa9
[ 361.337652] [<c023d156>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x2a7/0x332
[ 361.338188] [<c023d208>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x27/0x37
[ 361.338631] [<c0f5d180>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x72/0xa9
[ 361.339095] [<c0f59fd8>] __wait_for_common+0xfa/0x1a5
[ 361.339534] [<c0f57339>] ? console_conditional_schedule+0x61/0x61
[ 361.340119] [<c020628f>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x377/0x377
[ 361.340561] [<c0f5a25a>] wait_for_completion+0x27/0x38
[ 361.341014] [<c0372aa1>] writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x122/0x13b
[ 361.341502] [<c0f59f38>] ? __wait_for_common+0x5a/0x1a5
[ 361.341963] [<c0372bee>] writeback_inodes_sb+0x3a/0x4c
[ 361.342413] [<c037843a>] __sync_filesystem+0x3f/0xa8
[ 361.342848] [<c037850e>] sync_filesystem+0x6b/0xa8
[ 361.343274] [<c033782b>] generic_shutdown_super+0x56/0x18c
[ 361.343833] [<c0337991>] kill_block_super+0x30/0xd2
[ 361.344418] [<c0337b0f>] deactivate_locked_super+0x3e/0xb9
[ 361.344919] [<c0338bf3>] deactivate_super+0x69/0x7a
[ 361.345350] [<c0360827>] mntput_no_expire+0x23b/0x24e
[ 361.345795] [<c036229c>] sys_umount+0x5f4/0x60c
[ 361.346199] [<c03622d4>] sys_oldumount+0x20/0x30
[ 361.346607] [<c0f5d668>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
[ 361.347027] 1 lock held by umount/3426:
[ 361.347361] #0: (&type->s_umount_key#18){++++..}, at: [<c0338bde>]
deactivate_super+0x54/0x7a
[16:40:14] [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see
/root/xfstests/results/generic/299.out.bad)
--- tests/generic/299.out 2013-04-05 21:41:17.000000000 -0400
+++ /root/xfstests/results/generic/299.out.bad 2013-04-12
16:40:14.678565323 -0400
@@ -3,3 +3,6 @@
Run fio with random aio-dio pattern
Start fallocate/truncate loop
+./common/rc: line 2055: 3353 Segmentation fault "$@" >>
$seqres.full 2>&1
+failed: '/root/xfstests/bin/fio /tmp/3152-299.fio'
+(see /root/xfstests/results/generic/299.full for details)
...
(Run 'diff -u tests/generic/299.out
/root/xfstests/results/generic/299.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
Ran: generic/299
Failures: generic/299
next reply other threads:[~2013-04-12 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-12 21:03 Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2013-04-13 9:09 ` xfstests failure generic/299 Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-14 22:47 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-04-15 9:15 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-15 18:43 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-04-16 8:20 ` Dmitry Monakhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=nsxvc7ra2cv.fsf@closure.thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).