From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: guolingxing <guolingxing@tju.edu.cn>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ext4: check return value of blkdev_issue_flush() when replaying fast commits
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 06:36:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-169109@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013062618.1741670-3-guolingxing@tju.edu.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] ext4: regression causing mount failures on devices lacking flush support
- [Medium] ext4: severe mount delay due to O(N) per-inode fast commit cache flush
--
commit 1d9ac3ed6ced15861bdc5e6964915fbce6a1b1e6
Author: guolingxing <guolingxing@tju.edu.cn>
ext4: check return value of blkdev_issue_flush() when replaying fast commits
This patch updates ext4_fc_replay_inode() to check and return the error
code from blkdev_issue_flush(). It intends to abort the fast commit replay
and fail the mount if the cache flush fails.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
> index ead8b16f9be07..f554405ebabfe 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
> @@ -2019,7 +2019,7 @@ static int ext4_fc_replay_inode(struct super_block *sb,
> out:
> iput(inode);
> if (!ret)
> - blkdev_issue_flush(sb->s_bdev);
> + ret = blkdev_issue_flush(sb->s_bdev);
[Severity: High]
Does this code introduce a regression for devices that do not support cache
flushes?
If the underlying block device (such as certain loop devices, ramdisks,
or older flash media) does not support flushes, blkdev_issue_flush() will
return -EOPNOTSUPP. Ext4 usually ignores -EOPNOTSUPP for flushes, but this
change unconditionally captures and returns the error code to the fast
commit replay mechanism.
As a result, fast commit replay will abort and the entire filesystem mount
will fail on these devices.
[Severity: Medium]
Can this flush cause severe mount delays during fast commit recovery?
Because ext4_fc_replay_inode() is called for every inode in the fast commit
journal, this will trigger an O(N) number of full device cache flushes.
This can cause significant performance degradation when processing a journal
with many EXT4_FC_TAG_INODE tags.
Additionally, is this flush structurally redundant? JBD2 already guarantees
a final blkdev_issue_flush() on the filesystem device (journal->j_fs_dev)
in jbd2_journal_recover() after all recovery passes (including fast commit
replay) are complete:
fs/jbd2/recovery.c:jbd2_journal_recover() {
...
/* Make sure all replayed data is on permanent storage */
if (journal->j_flags & JBD2_BARRIER) {
err2 = blkdev_issue_flush(journal->j_fs_dev);
if (!err)
err = err2;
}
...
}
>
> return ret;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261013062618.1741670-1-guolingxing@tju.edu.cn?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 6:26 [PATCH 1/3] ext4: check return value of blkdev_issue_flush() when initializing inode tables guolingxing
2026-10-13 6:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext4: check return value of blkdev_issue_flush() when starting a fast commit guolingxing
2026-10-13 6:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 6:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] ext4: check return value of blkdev_issue_flush() when replaying fast commits guolingxing
2026-10-13 6:36 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-13 6:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext4: check return value of blkdev_issue_flush() when initializing inode tables sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 8:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] ext4: check return value of blkdev_issue_flush() in unchecked call sites guolingxing
2026-10-13 8:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ext4: check return value of blkdev_issue_flush() when initializing inode tables guolingxing
2026-10-13 8:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 8:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ext4: check return value of blkdev_issue_flush() when starting a fast commit guolingxing
2026-10-13 8:34 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-169109@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=guolingxing@tju.edu.cn \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox