Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chris Mason" <mason@kernel.org>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/14] xfs: don't change the block map under a dirty folio
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 22:03:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-211886@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112214604.67875-4-mason@kernel.org>

> With CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=y, writeback on XFS can write in place
> to a shared block and corrupt the other file that shares it.
> 
> xfs_map_blocks() writes in place unless the COW fork has an extent for
> the block. write() and write faults reserve one before they dirty a
> folio over a shared block, so xfs_flush_unmap_range() writes back and
> truncates the range before a clone changes the block map. But the holder
> of a GUP write pin takes no filesystem lock, and the truncate keeps a
> large dirty folio that straddles the range:
> 
>     clone                         pin holder         writeback
>     =====                         ==========         =========
>     writes the range back
>                                   dirties the folio
>     truncate keeps the folio
>     maps a shared block under it
>                                   dirties it again
>                                                      finds no COW extent
>                                                      writes in place
>                                                      /* shared block */
> 
> The fix used here is to invalidate the range instead of truncating it,
> and to fail the call with -EINVAL if a dirty folio is left, before the
> block map changes.
> 
> Fixes: 6795801366da ("xfs: Support large folios")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112214604.67875-1-mason@kernel.org?part=3


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-12 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-12 21:46 [PATCH v9 00/14] reflink and atomic write bugs Chris Mason
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 01/14] xfs: don't skip the flush before shifting extents Chris Mason
2026-11-12 21:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 02/14] xfs: flush the shifted range before changing the file Chris Mason
2026-11-12 21:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 03/14] xfs: don't change the block map under a dirty folio Chris Mason
2026-11-12 22:03   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 04/14] iomap: don't punch delalloc under a dirty EOF block Chris Mason
2026-11-12 21:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 05/14] fs: validate atomic writes after O_APPEND and limits Chris Mason
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 06/14] xfs: recheck direct write alignment after write checks Chris Mason
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 07/14] xfs: test for reflink after the dio " Chris Mason
2026-11-12 21:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 08/14] xfs: refuse writes to files racing with realtime inode flag changes Chris Mason
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 09/14] xfs: test for always COW after the dio write checks Chris Mason
2026-11-12 21:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 10/14] xfs: refuse fallocate racing with realtime flag changes Chris Mason
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 11/14] xfs: take the MMAPLOCK in xfs_fileattr_set() Chris Mason
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 12/14] xfs: restart faults racing with realtime flag changes Chris Mason
2026-11-12 22:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 13/14] xfs: don't enable DAX on zoned inodes Chris Mason
2026-11-12 22:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 14/14] xfs: test for realtime and reflink under the pNFS locks Chris Mason
2026-11-12 22:02   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-211886@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mason@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox