From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] mke2fs: get device topology values from blkid
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:40:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1ab0s6ny7.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AB397F3.3090206@redhat.com> (Eric Sandeen's message of "Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:23:47 -0500")
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> writes:
>> Also, are you guys affected by the
>> previously-acked-sectors-are-now-gone problems with 512-byte
>> logical/4KB physical drives?
Eric> previously-acked-sectors-are-now-gone? I guess I haven't been
Eric> keeping up. What do you mean by this?
We already discussed this on irc. But in case anybody else are
wondering...
On a disk with 4KB physical blocks emulating 512-byte logical blocks the
drive firmware must resort to read-modify-write cycles and that opens up
a new error scenario:
4KB physical block: | 0 |
512b logical block: | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
^ ERROR
In this case we have successfully written LBA 0 - 6. However, when the
drive attempts to write LBA 7 it gets an I/O error and the previous 7
logical blocks (that have previously been acknowledged as written) are
lost. IOW, the drive write atomicity is at the physical block level and
not the logical ditto.
See http://oss.oracle.com/~mkp/docs/ls09-topology.pdf page 19 for
prettier graphics.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-18 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-17 22:22 [PATCH, RFC] mke2fs: get device topology values from blkid Eric Sandeen
2009-09-18 5:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-09-18 14:04 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-09-18 14:20 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-09-18 14:30 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-09-18 16:43 ` Theodore Tso
2009-09-18 16:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-09-18 6:13 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-09-18 14:18 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-09-18 14:23 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-09-18 19:40 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2009-09-18 20:28 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-09-20 20:46 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-09-22 14:30 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-09-18 23:59 ` Karel Zak
2009-09-19 3:03 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-09-21 17:06 ` [PATCH V2] " Eric Sandeen
2009-10-02 16:32 ` [PATCH V3] " Eric Sandeen
2009-10-04 19:16 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1ab0s6ny7.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).