From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
To: 'Jaegeuk Kim' <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: 'Changman Lee' <cm224.lee@samsung.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev][PATCH] f2fs: fix wrong memory footprint statistics in debugfs
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 20:09:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000201d02cce$70f628d0$52e27a70$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150106194834.GC54001@jaegeuk-mac02>
Hi Jaegeuk,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 3:49 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: Changman Lee; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev][PATCH] f2fs: fix wrong memory footprint statistics in debugfs
>
> Hi Chao,
>
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 04:40:49PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > Our value of memory footprint statistics showed in debugfs is not calculated
> > correctly. Fix it in this patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/debug.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/debug.c b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> > index dd7835b..6aeaf46 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> > @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static void update_mem_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > int i;
> >
> > if (si->base_mem)
> > - goto get_cache;
> > + goto get_dynamic_cache;
> >
> > si->base_mem = sizeof(struct f2fs_sb_info) + sbi->sb->s_blocksize;
> > si->base_mem += 2 * sizeof(struct f2fs_inode_info);
> > @@ -161,13 +161,18 @@ static void update_mem_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > si->base_mem += sizeof(struct f2fs_nm_info);
> > si->base_mem += __bitmap_size(sbi, NAT_BITMAP);
> >
> > +get_dynamic_cache:
> > /* build gc */
> > - si->base_mem += sizeof(struct f2fs_gc_kthread);
> > + if (sbi->gc_thread)
> > + si->base_mem += sizeof(struct f2fs_gc_kthread);
> > +
> > + /* build merge flush thread */
> > + if (SM_I(sbi)->cmd_control_info)
> > + si->base_mem += sizeof(struct flush_cmd_control);
>
> It seems base_mem increases repeatedly?
Right, my mistaken. How about counting memory of these two cache into cache_mem
as following?
>From edfa0beaed83ebfec34b07bfcb5e8ce3cdcb0858 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 19:24:24 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: fix wrong memory footprint statistics in debugfs
Our value of memory footprint statistics showed in debugfs is not calculated
correctly. Fix it in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
---
fs/f2fs/debug.c | 15 +++++++++++----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/debug.c b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
index 1f0fb58..b45daab 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/debug.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
@@ -163,13 +163,20 @@ static void update_mem_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
si->base_mem += sizeof(struct f2fs_nm_info);
si->base_mem += __bitmap_size(sbi, NAT_BITMAP);
+get_cache:
+ si->cache_mem = 0;
+
/* build gc */
- si->base_mem += sizeof(struct f2fs_gc_kthread);
+ if (sbi->gc_thread)
+ si->cache_mem += sizeof(struct f2fs_gc_kthread);
+
+ /* build merge flush thread */
+ if (SM_I(sbi)->cmd_control_info)
+ si->cache_mem += sizeof(struct flush_cmd_control);
-get_cache:
/* free nids */
- si->cache_mem = NM_I(sbi)->fcnt;
- si->cache_mem += NM_I(sbi)->nat_cnt;
+ si->cache_mem += NM_I(sbi)->fcnt * sizeof(struct free_nid);
+ si->cache_mem += NM_I(sbi)->nat_cnt * sizeof(struct nat_entry);
npages = NODE_MAPPING(sbi)->nrpages;
si->cache_mem += npages << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
npages = META_MAPPING(sbi)->nrpages;
--
2.2.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-10 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-06 8:40 [f2fs-dev][PATCH] f2fs: fix wrong memory footprint statistics in debugfs Chao Yu
2015-01-06 19:48 ` [PATCH] " Jaegeuk Kim
2015-01-10 12:09 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2015-01-11 5:35 ` [f2fs-dev][PATCH] " Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000201d02cce$70f628d0$52e27a70$@samsung.com' \
--to=chao2.yu@samsung.com \
--cc=cm224.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).