From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
To: 'Changman Lee' <cm224.lee@samsung.com>
Cc: 'Jaegeuk Kim' <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: reposition unlock_new_inode to prevent accessing invalid inode
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:53:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003801cfc29d$a370dad0$ea529070$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140828014736.GA6808@lcm>
Hi Changman,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Changman Lee [mailto:cm224.lee@samsung.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:48 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: reposition unlock_new_inode to prevent accessing invalid
> inode
>
> Hi Chao,
>
> I agree it's correct unlock_new_inode should be located after make_bad_inode.
>
> About this scenario,
> I think we should check some condition if this could be occured;
I think this condition is the almost impossible but which can happen theoretically.
> A inode allocated newly could be victim by gc thread.
> Then, f2fs_iget called by Thread A have to fail because we handled it as
> bad_inode in Thread B. However, f2fs_iget could still get inode.
> How about check it using is_bad_inode() in f2fs_iget.
Yes, agreed. How about return -EIO when this inode we iget_locked is bad?
Thanks,
Yu
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 06:35:29PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > As the race condition on the inode cache, following scenario can appear:
> > [Thread a] [Thread b]
> > ->f2fs_mkdir
> > ->f2fs_add_link
> > ->__f2fs_add_link
> > ->init_inode_metadata failed here
> > ->gc_thread_func
> > ->f2fs_gc
> > ->do_garbage_collect
> > ->gc_data_segment
> > ->f2fs_iget
> > ->iget_locked
> > ->wait_on_inode
> > ->unlock_new_inode
> > ->move_data_page
> > ->make_bad_inode
> > ->iput
> >
> > When we fail in create/symlink/mkdir/mknod/tmpfile, the new allocated inode
> > should be set as bad to avoid being accessed by other thread. But in above
> > scenario, it allows f2fs to access the invalid inode before this inode was set
> > as bad.
> > This patch fix the potential problem, and this issue was found by code review.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/namei.c | 10 +++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> > index 6b53ce9..845f1be 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> > @@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ static int f2fs_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t
> mode,
> > return 0;
> > out:
> > clear_nlink(inode);
> > - unlock_new_inode(inode);
> > make_bad_inode(inode);
> > + unlock_new_inode(inode);
> > iput(inode);
> > alloc_nid_failed(sbi, ino);
> > return err;
> > @@ -267,8 +267,8 @@ static int f2fs_symlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
> > return err;
> > out:
> > clear_nlink(inode);
> > - unlock_new_inode(inode);
> > make_bad_inode(inode);
> > + unlock_new_inode(inode);
> > iput(inode);
> > alloc_nid_failed(sbi, inode->i_ino);
> > return err;
> > @@ -308,8 +308,8 @@ static int f2fs_mkdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t
> mode)
> > out_fail:
> > clear_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_INC_LINK);
> > clear_nlink(inode);
> > - unlock_new_inode(inode);
> > make_bad_inode(inode);
> > + unlock_new_inode(inode);
> > iput(inode);
> > alloc_nid_failed(sbi, inode->i_ino);
> > return err;
> > @@ -354,8 +354,8 @@ static int f2fs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
> > return 0;
> > out:
> > clear_nlink(inode);
> > - unlock_new_inode(inode);
> > make_bad_inode(inode);
> > + unlock_new_inode(inode);
> > iput(inode);
> > alloc_nid_failed(sbi, inode->i_ino);
> > return err;
> > @@ -688,8 +688,8 @@ release_out:
> > out:
> > f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
> > clear_nlink(inode);
> > - unlock_new_inode(inode);
> > make_bad_inode(inode);
> > + unlock_new_inode(inode);
> > iput(inode);
> > alloc_nid_failed(sbi, inode->i_ino);
> > return err;
> > --
> > 2.0.0.421.g786a89d
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Slashdot TV.
> > Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
> > http://tv.slashdot.org/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-28 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-26 10:35 [PATCH] f2fs: reposition unlock_new_inode to prevent accessing invalid inode Chao Yu
2014-08-28 1:47 ` Changman Lee
2014-08-28 8:53 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2014-08-28 10:13 ` Changman Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='003801cfc29d$a370dad0$ea529070$@samsung.com' \
--to=chao2.yu@samsung.com \
--cc=cm224.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).